Islamic bank can mobilise various forms of deposits such as:
Wadiah (safekeeping)
Qard al-Hasan (benevolence loan)
Mudarabah (profit sharing)
Wakalah (agency)
Bay al-Tawarruq (commodity murabahah)
Islamic Investment Deposit:
Mudarabah (profit sharing) has two types:
Mudarabah mutlaqah (unrestricted mudarabah)
Mudarabah muqayyadah (restricted mudarabah)
Islamic Investment Deposit:
Wakalah (agency) includes wakala bil-istishmar (agency for investment)
Islamic Investment Deposit:
Bay al-Tawarruq (commodity murabahah)
Uses of funds in Islamic Banking (Asset side):
Bay Bithaman Ajil for home financing / Murabahah
Bai Bithaman Ajil for vehicle financing
Musharakah Mutanaqisah
Ijarah - Ijarah Muntahiyah bi al-Tamlik
Ijarah - Ijarah Mawsufah fi Dhimmah
Ijarah - Aitabait
Simple Istisna (customer has own financing)
Parallel Istisna (customer has not enough financing)
Bay al-Inah
Bay al-Tawarruq
Bay al-Dayn
Saving/Current:
Wadiah Yad Amanah
Wadiah Yad Amanah is not suitable to structure Islamic banking deposit product since it is a mere trust and charitable engagement with restrictive features such as non-guaranteed and non-utilization of the deposited asset
The issue of Bay’ al Dayn is one of the most contentious issues in modern Islamic finance, especially in the development of Islamic capital market products
Classical scholars held different views on the permissibility of Bay’ al Dayn
Those who allowed Bay’ al Dayn did so under strict conditions to avoid Shariah issues like gharar
In Malaysia, scholars have permitted Bay’ al Dayn as a concept used to develop Islamic capital market products
However, global acceptance of Bay’ al Dayn is limited, as scholars in most jurisdictions except Malaysia reject its permissibility
Bay’ al Dayn might take different dimensions and forms in modern Islamic capital markets compared to its classical applications
The paper discusses the meaning of Bay’ al Dayn, arguments for and against its permissibility, and its implications on the Malaysian Islamic capital market products
Dayn in the Shariah means debt, where one party is paid in cash and the other is on responsibility to be paid later
Debt can arise from deferred payment sales where the price will be paid in the future
Dayn is a responsibility on the debtor to pay a certain amount in the future
Qard is similar to dayn but implies pure lending or borrowing without any other transaction
Dayn is considered a form of property or commodity in Islamic finance
Bay’ al Dayn is the sale of debt, where the creditor sells their payable right upon the debtor to the debtor or a third party
Debt is usually sold at a discount price to the buyer in Bay’ al Dayn transactions
Debt can be sold in cash or in other forms of property
In Malaysia, Bay’ al Dayn involves selling debt resulting from exchange contracts like murabahah, bai` bithaman ajil, ijarah, istisna, and others
Bay' al-dayn is the sale of debt either to the debtor or the third party usually at a discount price by the cash price or by another debt
Bay' al-dayn has mainly two forms:
The sale of debt with cash price, which can be further divided into two:
Sale of debt with cash price to the debtor
Sale of debt with cash price to the third party
The sale of debt with deferred price, which also has two sub-divisions:
Sale of debt with deferred price to the debtor
Sale of debt with deferred price to the third party
Opinions on the permissibility of Bay' al-dayn have created a disagreement among scholars
Some scholars permitted or prohibited Bay' al-dayn in general
Some scholars differentiated their rulings based on the various forms and features of Bay' al-dayn, whether the debt is sold at cash or deferred or to the debtor or third party
Sale of Debt with Cash Price to the debtor:
Majority of scholars from the four major schools of law viewed this type of sale as permissible
Arguments include references to Quranic verses permitting trade and forbidding usury, and a hadith allowing the sale of what is under the right when the buyer is the debtor and payment is made on the spot
Some scholars like Ibn Hazm, Ibn Abbas, and Ibn Mas'ud viewed this sale as not permissible, citing Quranic verses and hadiths prohibiting the sale of uncertainty and debts by commodity
Some Hanbali scholars agree with the first opinion but add conditions such as the debt must be certain and the exchanging goods should be possessed on the spot
Majority scholars of Hanafi School and some Hanbali and Shafie scholars, along with Ibn Hazm, do not permit selling debt to the third party with cash price at all, citing the presence of uncertainty and potential conflicts
Sale of debt with cash price to the third party:
Some scholars from Shafie and Hanbali schools permit this type of sale, arguing that there is no authentic source prohibiting it
Maliki scholars impose eight conditions for permitting this type of sale, including expediting payment, debtor confirmation, and absence of enmity between buyer and seller
Shafie jurists impose conditions such as the debt being a spot debt in nature and the buyer paying the price on a spot basis
The creditor is not able to submit the sold item to the purchaser as the debt is under the liability of the debtor and to possess what is under others' responsibility cannot be imagined, therefore, it is not permitted as it is not capable of submission, subsequently contains risk to the sale
The risk might also arise from the fact that the debtor may deny his debt or delay in payment or he may become poor. In those cases, it is not possible to get the debt from him
There is a Hadith of the Prophet (peace be upon him) which clearly states: "Don’t sell what you do not possess"
It is based on another Hadith of the Prophet (peace be upon him) which prohibits selling or giving an item that the seller or giver is unable to deliver to the buyer or given: "Don’t sell the fish while they are in the water"
On the same ground, there is a Hadith, which states: "The Prophet prohibited the sale of a missing slave or the offspring of the offspring"
The contemporary scholars have looked into these arguments and disagreed on deciding the preferred opinion. Some scholars mostly from Malaysia preferred that selling debt with cash price to the third party is permissible
The main reason for prohibiting bay‟ al-dayn by the Hanafies and also conditions imposed by the Malikies and Shafies is mainly because of the element of risk and uncertainty for the buyer as the debtor may not pay the debt. If this uncertainty could be avoided by having strong regulatory, supervision, and control by the government then it should be permitted
Debt securities instruments based on the principle of bay` dayn are regulated by Bank Negara Malaysia and the Commission to safeguard the rights of the parties involved in the contract