Gerald is employed at his father's company, Crofts Limited, which competes with Birling & Co
Gerald's parents, Sir George Croft and Lady Croft, are socially superior to the Birlings
Priestley describes Gerald as an attractive, well-bred young man-about-town
Gerald contributes to the chain of events leading to Eva's suicide by using her as a mistress
Priestley uses Gerald to represent the individualism of the upper class
Gerald fails to change his capitalist and selfish attitudes, disappointing the audience
Gerald is portrayed as physically attractive, privileged, and likable
Priestley describes Gerald as "rather too manly to be a dandy", suggesting his confidence in masculinity
Gerald is depicted as an ideal husband and son-in-law due to his financial security and social status
Gerald's social status contributes to his attractiveness in 1912 British society
Gerald is portrayed as experienced with prostitutes, spending time in bars and socializing with them
Gerald's guilt for his actions towards Eva Smith is short-lived, showing a lack of true remorse
Gerald is portrayed as pragmatically moral, following a moral stance only when it suits his needs
Priestley presents Gerald as materialistic, viewing the world through possessions and financial aid
Gerald is depicted as patronizing and misogynistic, condescending towards women
Gerald excludes women from the current situation and tries to oppress women's voices
Gerald implies that Sheila is too emotional to think clearly and logically, suggesting she should leave the thinking to men
Gerald perpetuates a demeaning cult of victimhood by suggesting that young women should be protected from unpleasant things, yet he failed to protect Eva from his own actions
Priestley exposes that Gerald's true motive for wanting Sheila to leave is to hide his affair with Eva
Priestley intends for Gerald to be neither hated nor loved by the audience, maintaining him as a redeemable character with relative ambiguity
Priestley exposes the audience's indoctrination into a class-based system that favors them, showing their hypocrisy in responding to obvious suffering but ignoring subtle exploitation
Priestley conveys that apparent changes in attitudes of the upper-class are superficial through Gerald's actions
Gerald's monopoly on the narrative allows him to absolve himself from responsibility and adapt his story to the Inspector's knowledge
Gerald's dramatic exit after telling his story offers interpretations of guilt or entrenched feelings for Eva, showing a different side to him compared to the Birlings
Gerald's relationship with Eva is portrayed as predatory, with him viewing her as prey and objectifying her
Gerald's marriage to Sheila and his pursuit of Eva highlight gender norms and class differences in 1912 British society
Priestley uses euphemistic language to conceal Gerald's use of prostitutes, referring to them as "women of the town"
Gerald's relationship with Eva in the play explores how women were exploited and abused in 1912 society
There is a clear imbalance of power between Gerald and Eva in terms of social position and influence
Priestley portrays Gerald as having a distinct emotional reaction to Eva's death, which was considered a feminine trait at the time
Gerald disguises prostitution as charity through monetary exchanges with Eva
Priestley reveals the internal conflict within Gerald between his emotional reaction and societal expectations of masculinity
Priestley presents a pattern of the upper classes committing wrongful actions but convincing themselves it is acceptable
Gerald manipulates the truth by suggesting Eva was different girls, excusing his behavior and trying to maintain innocence
Priestley explores Gerald's initial attractive appearance and his portrayal as a husband and son-in-law
Priestley demonstrates how the upper class can manipulate the truth, reflecting the patriarchal society
Gerald's quote bank by theme includes responsibility, likeable appearance, capitalism, desire and lust, and class