false statement of fact which induces the other party to enter the contract
False statement of fact
cannot be a statement of opinion
Bisset v Wilkinson- statement of opinion is not a misrepresentation
But- unless D was an expert then it can be relied on- Smith v Land and House Property Corp
Silence
Cannot be misrepresentation- Smith v Hughes
But, Half-truths, statement which does not present the truth may be misrepresentation- Nottingham Brick and Tile Co v Butler
Statements which become false, duty to disclose the truth when the situation changes- With v O'Flanagan
Other representations- statement not to be interpreted too literally, Gordon v Selico Ltd- painting over dry rot before selling
Misrepresentation must have induced the contract
false statement must have induced the representee to enter into the contract
Must be material and it must be relied on
Materiality
must be that the reasonable person would have been induced into the contract through it
Reliance
representee must have relied on the misrepresentation
no reliance if they are not aware of the misrepresentation- Horsfall v Thomas
no reliance is the person does not rely on the misrepresentation- Attwood v Small
Types of Misrepresentation
Fraudulent misrepresentation
Negligent misrepresentation
Wholly innocent misrepresentation
Fraudulent misrepresentation
defined by Lord Herschell in Derry v Peek, " a false statement that is made knowingly, or without the belief that its the truth, or recklessly as to whether it be true of false"
Negligent misrepresentation
a false statement made by a person who had no reasonable grounds for believing it to be true
Wholly innocent misrepresentation
this is a false statement which the person makes honestly believing it to be true
Remedies for misrepresentation
rescission- put all parties in the position they were in before the contract was made