behaviours produce consequences - either positive or negative
positive reinforcement
increases likelihood of a response because it involves receiving a reward for the behaviour
negative reinforcement
increases the likelihood of a response happening because of the removal of or escaping from unpleasant consequences
-doing something to stop a bad thing happening
the skinner box
animal places in cage , if animal presses lever - food delivered
animal presses lever accidentally and rewarded by food , reward increases likelihood that behaviour will be repeat
=positive reinforcement
the skinner box
animal placed in cage with electric shock running through floor
rat learns to press leaver in order to stop the shock
=negative reinforcement
evaluation - strength
real life applications
led to development of treatments for various phobias = positive implications
token economy system successfully used in many institutions - rewards good behaviour with token that can be exchanged for privileges = positive implications
evaluation - strength
increased the scientific credibility of psychology by using lab experiments and focusing on observable data in highly controlled setting = behaviourist theories are falsifiable and based on empirical data
evaluation - weakness
most research is carried out on animals - may not generalise to humans due to humans having much higher cognitive functioning
but still a useful pointer in understanding human behaviour
evaluation - weakness
reductionist - reduces human behaviour to learning through rewards and associations - ignoring all other approaches =over-simplifies behaviour
evaluation - weakness
deterministic - skinner argues our past conditioning experiences WILL produce behaviour - doesn't allow any free will we may have over our behaviour = ignores possibility of freewill