Misrepresentations = Is a false state, factor or opinion. There is importance. Knowledge or skill of the person making the statement. Written contract
Elements of misrepresentations
False statement of fact
Statement of material fact not one of opinion
Must be made by a party to the contract of their agent - privity
Induces the other party to enter into the contact - It was the misrepresentation that led you into going into the contract
Untrue statement
(Fletcher v Krell) - Silence did not amount to misrepresentation unless they had a duty to communicate it
Certain types of contracts have stricter requirements
Fiduciary relationships - Relationships of trust. EG Doctor/patient
Utmost good faith - All material facts must be disclosed. (Lambert v Cooperative)
Consumer Insurance Act 2012
Consumer has a duty to take reasonable care not to make a misrepresentation to the insurer
Careless representation: insurer cannot avoid the contract, but can make a reduction
Deliberate or reckless: Insurer can avoid the contract and refuse all claims (usually without having to return the premiums that have been paid)
Untrue statement
(Fletcher v Krell)
Certain types of contract have stricter requirements
upmost good faith
Consumer insurance Act 2012
Half truth
The party tells a half truth or says something than later becomes untrue
(With v O'Flannagan) - Whether there remained an obligation to inform a party to a contract
Statement must be one of material fact not opinion
A statement of material fact
Statement of opinion or belief does not amount to a misrepresentation
There may be a representation if the matter of the statement does not honestly hold that opinion
(Bisset v Wilkinson)
A statement of material fact - Led a reasonable person to enter into the contract
Statement of opinion or belief does not amount to be a misrepresentation unless the maker of the statement is an expert or in a better position to know the truth
There may be a representation if the matter of the statement does not honestly hold that opinion
(Bisset v Wilkinson) - Gave an opinion and it was not of specialist knowledge
Must be made by a party to the contract or their agent
Not liable for statements made by other people unless they are your agent
So would not be liable if someone else makes a misrepresentation in a review
Induces the other party to enter the contract
Consider the first three and see if they are there
(Regrave v Hurd)
(Attwood v Small)
(Museprime v Adhill properties)
Misleading omissions regarding important information
Induces the other party to enter the contract
Consider the first three and see if they are there
Statement must lead the other party into making the contract
Must be important to the party making the contract
Party must have relied on the statement rather than their own knowledge or information
Induces the other party to enter the contract
(Redgrave v Hurd) - Whether D should have been expected to undertake further research. Into the proposed business by having a look at the accounts.
Induces the other party to enter the contract
(Attwood v Small) - Not a misrepresentation if the other party relies on their own judgement of information obtained elsewhere