Stuart Hall completed his studies on changing national identities and how national identity is not important in 1991
Stuart Hall (1991) argued that changing national identities is due to globalisation
Stuart Hall (1991) suggested that countries may display 3 different reactions to Globalisation:
Cultural Homogenisation
Cultural Hybridity
Cultural Resistance
Stuart Hall (1991) argued that countries may accept a GlobalCulture, and all countries will become more similar (This is known as Cultural Homogenisation)
Stuart Hall (1991) argued that countries may take some parts of Global Culture alongside with their more traditional culture, and develop a new but still individual culture (This is known as Cultural Hybridity)
Stuart Hall (1991) argued that countries may resistGlobal Culture and protect their cultural heritage, becoming more traditional and nationalistic (This is known as Cultural Resistance)
Here are the examples of Stuart Hall's (1991) reactions to Globalisation from different countries:
Cultural Homogenisation = America
Cultural Hybridity = United Kingdom
Cultural Resistance = India
An example of a country which took the reaction of Cultural Homogenisation in Stuart Hall's (1991) study is America (due to concepts of Americanisation)
An example of a country which took the reaction of Cultural Hybridity in Stuart Hall's (1991) study is the United Kingdom (due to Concepts of McDonaldization and Stanley Cups/Americanisation with still having national aspects such as Tea)
An example of a country which took the reaction of Cultural Resistance in Stuart Hall's (1991) study is India (Strong National Identity from Food such as Curry and traditions such as Bollywood)