The character Eva Smith symbolizes the lower classes as a whole, with the audience's perspective of her altered by the Birlings' classist remarks and bias
Mr. Birling, a member of the nouveau riche, is insecure about his social class, wanting to climb the social ladder and feeling entitled to respect and power
Mr. Birling's treatment of the lower classes is evident in his belief that they need to be put in their place, perpetuating the cycle of poverty and widening the class divide
Interactions between Mr. Birling and Gerald Croft demonstrate how social class influences people's actions with ulterior motives and causes unnecessary divisions
In the early 20th century, the increase in factories and business allowed people without noble backgrounds to become wealthy, creating a distinction between 'old money' and 'new money'
Mrs Birling believes all lower-class people are immoral and money-hungry, leading her to overreact and see every small flaw as confirmation of her bias
Mr. Birling's entitlement and superiority are challenged by the Inspector, who implies the upper classes "take" from society, presenting their entitlement as selfish and destructive
Gerald's objection to the Inspector's treatment reveals how the upper classes see a clear division between themselves as "respectable" and the "criminals" of the lower classes
Priestley suggests that the upper classes use appearances and masks to maintain their social respectability, presenting a facade of innocence and flawlessness
The play emphasizes the barrier constructed by the upper classes between rich and poor, symbolized by Sheila's metaphor of a "wall" that separates them
Eva Smith symbolizes the mistreatment of all lower-class people, with every member of the elite family implicated in the oppression of the lower classes
The play challenges the values of the upper classes, revealing their prejudices and moral failings, suggesting a future where their wrongs will be exposed