Analogy provides a best explanation style argument when the cause of something cannot be directly observed
In scientificinference, if we know X is caused by Z, we can infer by analogy that something similar to X is caused by something similar to Z
Hume argues that the similarity of two effects does not necessarily mean they have similar causes; for example, the smoke produced by fire and dry ice is very similar, but their causes are not similar
Hume points out the radicaldisanalogies between the creation of the universe and anything else we know of, questioning the validity of drawing analogies between them
Hume also argues that we cannot claim there is an analogy between artifacts and natural objects, as artifacts are mechanical with a mathematicallyprecisedesign, while the universe appears more organic and chaotic
Paley's argument for design is not necessarily based on an analogy between artifacts and the universe, but on the property of complexity and purpose found in both man-made and natural things