-High degree control, all variables precisely monitored ^ accuracy
-Replication Researchers can repeat and check results
Limitations:
-Experimenter’s bias: bias can affect results and participants can be influenced by expectations.
-Lowe ecological validity due to high degree of control= artificial
S and L of field experiments
Strength:
Naturalistic so higher ecological validity due to natural behaviour
Controlled IV
Limitation
Cannot random;y allocate participants to conditions. So there may be confounding variables. make sit harder to conclude the IV caused the DV
S and L of quasi experiments.
Strength:
Controlled conditions so likely to have high internal validity
Replicable
Limitations:
cannot randomly allocate participants to conditions so hard to determine if the IV was hat had an affect on the DV
S and L Natural experiments
Strength:
Provides research oppourtunities which would have been impossible otherwise due to practical or ethical reasons
High external validity as dealing with real life issues.
Limitation:
naturally occurring events, rare so hard to replicate and generalise findings
very difficult to randomise into groups so problems with confounding and extraneous variables.
What is a population in terms of sampling ?
A group of people from whom the sample is drawn.
S and L of opportunity sampling.
s
easy method of recruitment, saves time and money
L
Not representative of the whole population so lacks validity
Researcher bias as the researcher chooses who they want to select
S and L random sampling
s
NO researcher bias as sample random so researcher has no control.
L
Time consuming, researcher needs a sampling frame and contacting people takes a lot of time.
Volunteer bias: Participants can refuse to take part so can end up with an unrepresentative sample.
S and L systematic sampling
S
Avoids researcher ias and farly representative of the population.
L
Not truly unbiased less random number generator is used the. start the systematic sample.
What is systematic sampling?
A predetermined system is used whereby every nth number is selected from the sampling frame. the numberical selection is applied consistently.
S and L of stratified sampling.
s
No researcher bias. selection is done randomly.
Produces representative data due to proportional strata. So is generalisable.
L
Time consumming to identify strata and contact people.
Identified strata cannot represent differences of all people in a wider population.
S and L of volunteer sampling
s
Willing participants so easy and not time consuming.
Participants more likely to cooperate in study since volunteered to take part.
L
volunteer bias, the study may attract as pacific type of person so genralisability is affected.
Ulterior motives like money so participant may not be taking study seriously, which influences results.
s, l and solu to independent groups design
s
No order effects presented as participants only do one condition.
Demand characteristics are eliminated
l
No control over participant variables. Differnet abilities of participants in conditions can affect DV.
You need more participants to gather the same amount of data.
Solu
Random allocation soLoves order effects. Ensures each participat has same likelihood in being in one condition of the iv as the other.
S, L and solu of repeated measures design
S
eliminates participant variables
Fewer participants needed so no as time consuming
L
Order effects
Solu
Counterbalancing when half do one of conditions in one order and half do one of conditions in other order.
s, l, solu of matched pairs design
s
No order effects
demand characteristics are less of a problem.
L
Time consuming and expensive
Large pool participants needed which can be hard to get
Difficult to know which variables are appropriate to match
solu:
n/a
What is a control group
Sets a baseline whereby results from the experimental condition can be compared to the results from this one.
Strengths and limitations of an unstructured observation
s
More richness and depth of detail
l
Produces qualitative data which is more difficult to record and analyse
Greater risk of observer bias as will only record catch the eye behaviours
s and l of structured observation
s
Easier as more systematic
Quatitanite data collected, easy to analyse and compare with other data
Less risk of observer bias.
L
Not much death of detail
Difficult to achieve high inter-observer reliability as filling the predetermined lists is subjective.
What are behavioural categories
Target behaviour which is being observed is broken down into precise components which are observable and measurable. EX. agressive behaviour can be punching/swearing.