animal studies look at the early bonds between non-human parents and their offspring
can help us understand attachment in humans
imprinting
form of learning where a young animal fixes on the first object that moves
this happens within the first dew hours of birth, if it does, then it won't happen at all
there is a critical period for the imprinting
Lorenz (1935) - procedure
took a clutch of gosling eggs and dividing them into two groups
one group was hatched with their natural mother and the others were hatched in an incubator
when the incubator eggs hatched the first living thing that they saw moving was Lorenz and soon started following him around
Lorenz marked the two groups to distinguish them and placed them together
both Lorenz and the natural mother were present
Lorenz (1935) - findings
the goslings divided themselves, one following the natural mother and the other following Lorenz
Lorenz's brood showed no recognition of their natural mother
noticed that this process of imprinting is restricted to a very indefinite period of the animal's life
if an animal is not exposed to a moving object during this period they will not imprint
imprinting to humans did not occur in some animals, for example, curlews will not imprint on a human
long lasting effects of imprinting
the process is irreversible and long lasting
has a later effect on mate preferences and animals will choose a mate with the same kind of object of which they were imprinted
evaluation
lots of replication, all coming to similar conclusions with other species of birds
young animals are not born with a predisposition to imprint to a certain type of object but actually imprint to any moving object within the critical period
supports Lorenz's predictions that animals are born with an innate mechanism to imprint on a moving object in a critical period
has both external and internal validity
birds can't be generalised to humans
the mammalian attachment system is very different to the birds
Harlow (1959) - procedure
created 2 mothers each with a different head and one was wrapped in soft cloth
8 infant rhesus monkeys were studied for 165 days
for 4 monkeys the milk bottle was on the cloth-covered mother and on the plain wire mother for the 4 others
measurements were made of the amount of time each infant spent with the different mothers
observations were also made of the monkey's responses when frightened
Harlow (1959) - findings
all 8 monkeys spent most of their time with the cloth covered mothers
those monkeys who fed from the wire mother only spent a short amount of time getting milk and then returned to the cloth-covered mother
when frightened, all monkeys clung to the cloth-covered mother
when playing with new objects the monkeys often kept one foot on the cloth covered mother for reassurance
these findings suggest that infants do not develop an attachment to the person who feeds them but to the person who offers contact
long lasting effects - Harlow
motherless monkeys, even those who had contact comfort, developed abnormally
socially abnormal - froze or fled when approached by other monkeys
sexually abnormal - did not show normal mating behaviour and didn't cradle their own babies
there is also a critical period for these effects
if motherless monkeys spent time with their peers, they seem to recover but this was only if this happened before 3 months
having more than 6 months with only a wire mother was something they didn't appear to recover from