this reward reinforces the action so the baby repeats it to get rewarded again
the baby associates crying with getting food/comfort
two-way process because as the baby is reinforced from crying, the caregiver receives negative reinforcement as the crying stops
an escape from something unpleasant and by feeding the baby you are decreasing the likelihood of negative behaviour
positive reinforcement
repeating a behaviour because it is rewarded
negative reinforcement
rewarding to reduce the likelihood of negative behaviour being produced
primary and secondary reinforcers
infant seeks food because it's hungry
food gives it pleasure
mother is associated with food through classical conditioning
when an infant is fed, the drive of hunger is reduced, which produces a feeling of pleasure as they are comfortable again
the food is a prim
primary reinforcer because it directly supplies a reward
the mother or caregiver who supplies the food is associated with the food and so becomes the secondary reinforcer
the infant becomes attached to the mother because she is a source of the reward
evaluation
base on non-humananimalstudies
a range of animal studies have shown that young animals do not necessarily attach to (or imprint on) those who feed them - e.g. Lorenz's study
learning theory may not provide a complete explanation of attachment but it has some value as the main reinforce is going to be comfort and attention rather than food
Schaffer and Emerson found 39% of infants developed a primary attachment to the person who did not feed them and therefore completely goes against this theory