Purpose of damages in contract law, as per Robinson v Harman, is to put you in the position you should have been in if the contract was carried out as agreed
Agreed damages clauses in contracts specify an amount to be paid if the contract is broken, and the court will uphold this amount, usually found in commercial contracts
Causation in contract law includes factual and legal causation, illustrated by Stansbie v Troman where a decorator failing to lock the door led to a burglary
Remoteness in legal causation, per Hadley v Baxendale, limits claims to foreseeable losses; unforeseeable losses like loss of profits due to late delivery may not be compensated
Mitigation duty in contract law requires claimants to try to keep losses down; failure to mitigate reasonably can lead to a reduction in the claim amount or even claim failure
Wiseman v Virgin Atlantic case example: exaggerated claims for special treats after theft and breakup were not all compensable, showing the limits of damages in contract law
Purpose of damages under Robinson v Harman: compensatory damages aim to put the innocent party in the position as if the contract had been successfully performed
In Ruxley v Forsyth, the 'cost of cure' can be claimed if reasonable; for example, a swimming pool built with incorrect dimensions couldn't claim the cost of demolish and rebuild as it was deemed unreasonable
Agreed damages clauses: parties include a clause in the contract setting out the compensation amount if one side breaches the contract; courts usually follow this unless it's 'manifestly excessive'