Compliance: agreeing externally with the group but keeping personal opinions, a temporary change in behavior
Identification: behaving with private values changing only when with the group, as membership is valued
Internalization: personal opinions genuinely change to match the group, a permanent change
Informational social influence: individuals look for the majority for guidance on correct behaviors, resulting in internalization, a permanent change
Normative social influence (NSI): individuals conform to appear normal and be approved by the majority, leading to compliance, a superficial temporary action
Variables affecting conformity as investigated by Asch (1951):
Group size variation: conformity increased with more Confederates, but beyond three, conformity rates didn't increase
Social support: if one Confederate gives a correct response disagreeing with the majority, conformity drops
Task difficulty: when the difference in line lengths is small, conformity increases due to informational social influence (ISI)
Milgram (1963) conducted a study on obedience:
Participants were asked to deliver electric shocks to a learner, with obedience dropping when the learner was in the same room as the teacher
Obedience rates were high, with 65% going to the full 450 volts, showing the power of authority figures
Milgram's study on obedience found that situational variables, like proximity to the learner, significantly affected obedience rates
Milgram's study on obedience to authority:
Participants were instructed to continue giving shocks up to 450 volts
Obedience dropped to 40% when the learner was in the same room
Obedience dropped to 30% when the teacher had to physically hold the learner's hand on the shock plate
Location replication in an office block in a rundown area showed obedience up to 47.6%
Uniform replication with the professor replaced by a Confederate in normal clothes resulted in obedience dropping to 20%
Adorno's study in the 1950s focused on personality questionnaires revealing unconscious feelings towards minority groups, developing the F scale to measure authoritarian personalities
Elms and Milgram's 1966 interviews of participants in Milgram's studies showed those who administered the full 450 volts scored higher on the F scale, linking authoritarian personalities to following orders
Resistance to social influence:
Social support reduces pressure to obey or conform
Locus of control, with a high internal locus of control leading to more resistance to social influence
Minority influence requires individuals to reject majority behaviors or beliefs and be converted to the views of a minority
Social change:
Minorities can change majority positions through consistency, flexibility, and commitment
The snowball effect speeds up the process as more of the majority convert to the new view
Social crypt amnesia occurs after societal change, where individuals refuse to admit they held the old view