Save
Psychology
Memory
Eye-witness testimony
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Share
Learn
Created by
Sam Tennant
Visit profile
Cards (49)
Eye-witness testimony can be inaccurate or
distorted
Eye witness testimony is evidence provided by people who witnessed an event. Relies on
recall memory
EWT includes descriptions of
criminals
and crime scenes
Witnesses in EWT often
inaccurate
in recollection of events . (Important factor for police interviews)
EWT - many
cognitive psychs
focus on factors affecting
accuracy
of EWT and how it can be improved
Loftus and Palmer
(1974) investigated how EWT can be distorted
Loftus and Palmer (1974) EWT - Experiment 1 method
Ps shown film of multiple
car crash
Asked series of questions "How fast do you think the cars were going when they hit"
Word hit was replaced with:
Smashed
,
collided
,
bumped
or
contacted
Loftus and Palmer car crash question
" How
fast
do you think the
cars
were going when they
hit
"
Loftus and Palmer (1974) EWT - Experiment 1 results
Word
smashed
had highest estimated speed (41mph)
Word contacted had
lowest
estimated speed (32 mph)
Loftus and Palmer (1974) EWT - Experiment 2 method
Ps split in
3
groups
Group one verb "
smashed
"
Group two verb "
hit
"
Group three
no verb
given
One week later asked question "Did you see any broken
glass
"
Loftus and Palmer (1974) EWT - Experiment 2 results
No broken glass in film, Ps in group
1
(smashed) more likely to say there was
glass
Loftus and Palmer (1974) EWT - Conclusions
Leading questions affect accuracy of memories of
events
Loftus and Palmer (1974) EWT - Evaluation
Implications for
police interviews
Artificial
experiment = video is less
emotionally arousing
Later study found Ps witnessed a
real robbery
gave accurate description of robber
Experimental design
could have had demand characteristics due to Ps expectations of the purpose of the experiment
Leading questions may have given clues on nature of the study
Reduced
validity
and
reliability
Loftus
and
Zanni
(
1975
) looked at
leading questions
Loftus and Zanni (1975) - leading questions - Method
Shown film of a car crash
Asked "
Did you see the/a broken headlight
"
Loftus and Zanni (1975) - leading questions - Results
17%
those asked the question with " the " claimed they saw a broken headlight
7% asked the question with " a " claimed they saw a broken headlight
Loftus and Zanni (1975) - leading questions - Conclusion
Use of
word
" the " is
enough
to affect
accuracy
of
recall
Loftus and Zanni (1975) - leading questions - Evaluation
Good implications for EWT
Lab study =
control
of extraneous variables
Possible to establish
cause
and
effect
Study artificial =
lack ecological validity
Post
event
discussion can affect
accuracy
of recall
Shaw et al (1997) Accuracy of recall method
Paired Ps with
confederate
Shown videos of staged robbery and were interviewed
together
after
Shaw et al (1997) Accuracy of recall results
Participant responding
first
, recall was accurate
58
% time
Confederate responding first and
accurately
, Ps accurate
67%
time
Confederate answering first
inaccurately
, Ps accurate
42
% time
Gabbert et al (2004) Accuracy of recall Method
2
groups
of
Ps
Young adults
and
older adults
watched staged crime and then exposed to misleading information
Gabbert et al (2004) Accuracy of recall.
How was info mislead
Conversation with
confederates
Reading written of crime
Gabbert et al (2004) Accuracy of recall, results
Both groups of adults more likely to report
inaccurate
info after conversation rather than report
Age
of witness can affect accuracy of
ewt
Valentine and Coxon (1997) - Age affect on EWT - Method
3
groups of Ps (children, young people, elderly people)
Watched video of kidnapping
Asked series of
leading
and
non-leading
questions
Valentine and Coxon (1997) - Age affect on EWT - results
Elderly people and children gave more
incorrect
answers to
non-leading
questions
Children the
most
mislead by
leading
questions
Valentine and Coxon (1997) - Age affect on EWT - Conclusion
Age has an affect on EWT
Valentine and Coxon (1997) - Age affect on EWT - Evaluation
Implications in
law
when children questioned
Artificial experiment
= less emotionally arousing
Lack ecological validity
Results show how well people remember things from TV but don't
generalise
to other situations
Low and high levels of
anxiety
have a negative affect on
accuracy
of memory
In
violent
crimes
, the witness may focus on
central
details
Loftus (1979) - weapon focus in EWT - Method
Ps
heard discussion in nearby room
Condition 1, man came out room with pen and grease on hands
Condition 2, man came out of room with a knife
Ps asked to identify the man in
50
photos
Loftus (1979) - weapon focus in EWT - Results
Ps in condition 1 were
40%
accurate
Ps in condition 2 were
33%
accurate
Loftus (1979) - weapon focus in EWT - Conclusion
When
anxious
and
aroused
, witnesses focus on a
weapon
at the
expense
of other
details
Loftus (1979) - weapon focus in EWT - Evaluation
High ecological validity
as Ps weren't aware it was staged
Ethical
considerations (distress seeing a man with a knife)
Yuille and Cutshall (1986) showed evidence of real
shooting
and accurately recalled events
Cognitive interview was developed to increase
accuracy
Cognitive interview was developed by
geiselman et al
(1984) to increase accuracy of witness recall
Stages of cognitive interview. Stage 1
Relax the
witness
and tailor the
language
to suit the witness
Stages of cognitive interview, stage 2
Witness mentally recreates
environmental
context and
internal
context
See all 49 cards