rejectideology and dogma that the bestroute to solving a problem is not necessarily what one's beliefs say
Newright- much moreideological & requires firmleadership to steer gov & country into Neo-liberalism
one-nation- highly pragmatic
core ideas- Tradition
Believe events in the past hold knowledge for people in the present
closely linked with paternalism and hierarchy
people in history who have ruled know what's best for the people
rejected by the newright
core ideas- tradition
organic Change: social changed shouldn't be radical or mechanistic, society evolves organically - gradual rather than revolutionary, supported by Cons who want to preserve order in society
Revolutionary change: disrupts order & hierarchy, is a danger to law & order & private property, society is constantly evolving - revolution does not solve society's problems, society functionsbetter if change is gradual
core ideas- human imperfection
reject ideas from enlightenment, argue human nature can't be perfected
opposes liberal idea of rationality
humans are imperfect and are therefore unable to make good/rational decisions for themselves
psychological imperfection
Moral imperfection
intellectual imperfection
core ideas- human imperfection

psychological imperfection
our brains make us irrational, we behave ins ays that are familiar & comforting, rather than things that may be better for us
humans are attracted to safety, comfort and order, rather than radical ideas & change
order & hierarchy should be preserved
institutions that protect order & hierarchy should be preserved
core ideas- human imperfection

moral imperfection
humans are flawed and can't always act rationally or perfectly
leads to cons view of crime as being a result of flawedmoral characteristic rather than inequalities in the world
believe in behaviourregulation through the law (anti-permissiveness), as a result of moral imperfection
core ideas- human imperfection
intellectual imperfection
human rationality is imperfect and unreliable, humans are intellectually imperfect
the world around us is more complicated than our intellects are able to comprehend
disagrees with liberal view that humans can create a free society through rationality
instead, we are unable to understand society around us, & to try and completely overhaul what already exists would not be successful
core ideas- organic society/state
society develops as an organism , rather than a man-made device & is therefore constantly changing
cons support this through gradual change, believe society will evolve to fit needs of the present
idea links to beliefs in authority- those in authority are there bc they are society's natural leaders
cohesive society suggests state unity is more important than disagreement between state's individual parts,
e.g., change to conserve
core ideas- organic society/state
"change to conserve"
ideas of organic change in society
believe its important to adapt to changing circumstances in society, as long as these adaptations conserve basic principles of social order, hierarchy and tradition
for this reason, many cons favour gradual & evolutionary change rather than radical change
preserves status quo while ensuring cons party remains relevant to electorate
core ideas- authority
crucial in preserving order
ideas of paternalism and hierarchy, there should be a social structure, people in charge of others & those people act in best interests of this ethey have authority over
links to ideas of the social contract
by giving up some of our freedom, we gain security through law & order
3 types according Max Weber
Charismatic authority
rational-legal authority
traditional authority
core ideas- authority 

charismatic authority
where authority comes form personality and characteristics of the leader
rational legal authority
authority comes form legal system and rationalism
core ideas- authority 

traditional authority
comes from traditions & customs and acceptance of historical state of affairs
more likely to preserve freedom in society and traditional hierarchies, eg, monarchy
eg, the fact that of the 56 PMs the uk has had, 42 have studied at Oxbridge
Core ideas- Hierarchy
political systems and structures are hierarchal, a re the best political systems as they are the fairest and most beneficial to the people inside them
were all born with different merits and abilities
some are more suited to leadership and high status while others are more suited to low-status positions and jobs
revolutionary change and abandoning of hierarchy are ignorant of this fact
eg, Camerons Govs 2010-16- dominated by old Etonian, privately educated, oxbridge graduates
core ideas- paternalism
belief that some members of society should lead others and it is these people who have obligations to those below them to look after their best interests
human perfection justifies paternalism- humans may not always make best choices for themselves, therefore is acceptable to act on behalf of other people
support trustee model of rep dem rather than delegate model
traditional paternalism
core ideas- paternalism

traditional paternalism
traditional conservatism takes forceful and authoritarian approach to paternalism
idea that the state knows best, therefor everyone has to do as the state says
core ideas- paternalism

one nation & paternalism
roots in the idea of noblesse oblige
obligation of the aristocracy and upper classes to look after the working classes and less fortunate
core ideas- paternalism

rejection of paternalism by the New Right
reject many paternalist ideas, focused instead on individualism
the individual had a responsibility to look after themselves and their family
Thatcher rejected paternalist ideas of the establishment looking after the working classes by ousting social security, eg, state pensions
core ideas- empiricism
opposes idea that we can get knowledge from theoretical concepts
supports con belief in tradition, using the past a s a source of wisdom
organic society
supported by empiricism as institutions and practices have evolved after time to best suit needs of society
we can only have knowledge of things we have seen or experienced
thus the impact of ideas eg liberal rationality and socialism are unknowable
core ideas- anti-permissiveness
not allowing people to make their own moral choices
opposes permissiveness, where these behaviours are allowed to take place
eg, Thatcher introducing section 28 of the Local Government Act 1987- prohibited the mention of homosexuality in school sex ed
core ideas - libertarianism
promotion of freedom, free choice and autonomy, mainly focused on applying such concepts to the economy
libertarians take positions similar to classical liberals, support freedom, individuality and as little gov intervention as possible
state functions: favour 'night watchman' state, where the only functions of the state are to protect private property and maintain law & order
state only has a military, police and courts
idea rejected by many conservatives as it is highly radical
core ideas-libertarianism
The economy
support free-market economy, indvdls should be responsible for their own economic choices & the gov shouldn't intervene
price of goods & services et by supply & demand, gov intervention make it inefficient
core ideas-libertarianism

Moral values
support freedom of the gov intervention in an individuals' personal life
tend to accept things that have been more historically controversial in people's personal lives, as long as it doesn't harm others
libertarians in the US, support the 2nd amendment right to own a gun
also have historically supported the right of gay people to marry
opposes anti-permissiveness
laissez-faire economy
political & economic system which supports minimal gov intervention in business and state
associated with Neo-liberalism, and classical liberal thinkers eg Adam Smith
Cons party adopted stance of laissez-faireism under leadership of Robert Peel
traditional conservatism
emerged as a reaction to the Enlightenment and the consequences of the French Revolution
Edmund Burke father of trad cons
defends the established order and how change will sometimes e necessary to maintain the status quo
traditional conservatism & the state
for imperfect humans, the state provides the authority necessary to act as a break on individuals' worst instincts
the state, led by the elite has a natural authority with a disciplinary function to provide order, security and stability to society
traditional conservatism & society
Hierarchal and unequal, it is organised this way as humans do not have the same abilities, talents, or energy,
occupations are differentiated by skill and ability, and financial rewards(wages) are decided by the supply and demand of the market
view society's elite as the natural leaders and believe that other social groups should accept their ability to lead in the best interests of society as a whole
traditional conservatism and society
when needed, society can carefully change (not radically), guided by tradition, pragmatism, empiricism, hierarchy and judaeochristian morality
not contrived or created but emerges organically, development of society cannot be predicted only responded to
traditional conservatism- human nature
view humans as intellectually imperfect and incapable of infallible rational thought promised by political ideas such as those of liberals .
one nation conservatism- traditional
emerge late 19th century
updated Burke's idea that society needed to change to conserve
PM Disraeli felt society was threatened by social and economic consequences of the industrial revolution
Increasing class inequality and declining sense of community
embraced paternalism and social reform acting in the interests of everyone and preserving one nation
developed in 20th century under Macmillan and ideas still present in ideas of Cameron and May
one nation conservatism
Disraeli introduced social reforms to counter the negative effects of capitalism and laissez faire gov
by using pragmatism to address social issues, he reduced the possibility of social unrest
the Second Reform Act 1867- gave working men the vote
the Sale of Food and Drugs Act 1875
Post-war housing in the UK - Macmillan succeeded in building 300,000 houses a year as Churchill's housing minister
PM 157-63, Macmillan combined state ownership nd private enterprise
His adoption of a mixed economy reframed Disraeli's one nation cons for the 20th century
One nation conservatism
Cameron championed communal responsibilities, attempting to rebrand one nation cons as 'compassionate conservatism' with his Big Society initiatives
Cameron & May maintained this ideology by 'changing to conserve' the UK by accepting devolution, but opposing Scottish & Welsh independence
May demonstrated one nation values by a arguing for a society that respects the 'bonds of the family, community and citizenship'
Christian Democracy
European version of One- nation conservatism
influenced by paternalistic ideas of Friedrich List
stresses importance of noblesse oblige & communal duty
emphasises the importance of a 'social market' of capitalism
unlikes one nation cons, CD favour supranationalism
exemplified in the EU, where sovereignty is pooled with other nation states
NewRight
emerged in the UK & US late 1970s
Reaction against the ideas of one nation cons, modern liberalism, and social democracy
formed of 2 strands:
neo-liberalism
neo conservatism
neo-liberalism
modernised version of classical liberalism
focuses on minimalstate, atomistic society, free market economy and individualfreedom
critique of govintervention gained traction in 1970s when western Govs adopting Keynesian economics struggled to cope with stagflation
Neo-conservatism
modernised version of traditional conservatism
focuses on morality, social order, and hawkish foreign policy
Neo-cons were critical of permissive social attitudes that became mainstream after the social revolution of the 60s
sought more authoritarian foreign policy, especially against communist states, eg USSR
Neo-liberalism - Human Nature
rational and self-seeking
Ayn Rand rejected idea of human imperfection
Neo-liberalism-society
Is atomistic
individual rights and freedom are more important than societal obligations and duties
argued by Rand and Nozick
Neo-liberalism- state
fera duties and obligations present in the organicstate
perceived as threat to freedom
Rand & Nozick argued that individual's obligations should be to themselves rather than to state & society
gov should 'roll back the state' to preserve individualfreedom
rand & nozick argued that high taxation infringes individualrights and a welfare state creates a dependency culture
indvdls should rise and fall based on their abilities, with nohelp or assistance from the state
Neo-liberalism- Economy
state planning and nationalised companies worsen economic performance as they distort the free market
Neo-liberalism-Economy
stateplanning and nationalised companies worsen economic performance as they distort the freemarket
inefficient, lacking free-market dynamism & innovation, and are artificially protected from free-market competition which distorts the overall market