Cards (10)

  • Causation?

    the link between D’s actions and the criminal consequences.
  • White? (causation)

    D is a fatal cause if, but for their actions, the harm would not have occurred.
  • Kimsey?
    D is a legal cause if their contribution was more than minimal.
  • What can new intervening acts do?
    break the chain of causation.
  • Williams?
    V’s own actions will break the chain if they are daft and unforeseeable.
  • Roberts?
    V’s own actions won’t break the chain if their actions are foreseeable.
  • Cheshire?
    Medical negligence can break the chain if the treatment is independent of D’s actions and potent in itself in causing the harm.
  • Jordan? (example)
    the wound D caused had already healed, when the doctor had given him a drug he was allergic to and killed him.
  • Padgett?
    Third party intervention will break the chain if it is unforeseeable, but not if it was foreseeable from D’s actions, like police shooting back in Padgett.
  • Blaue?
    Thin Skull rule: take your victim as you find them - V’s vulnerabilities will never break the chain.