Had a long standing reputation as a midwife, healer and cunning woman, the typical suspect
King James interrogated her at Holyrood Palace in Edinburgh after officials had already found a Devils mark
Interrogated with cordstwisted tightly around her limbs and keptawake for several days and nights
Her charges included: healing the sick, sailing across the sea in a sieve and ordering members of her coven to raise a storm to prevent Anne of Denmark‘s arrival in Scotland
James became interested in Sampson’s case late1590s.
He accused her of lying in her confession to raising storms so she took him aside and repeated the words him and Anne had shared in their bedroom. This convinced James.
Her knowledge of witchcraft may have come from her experience as a healer.
The magistrates agreed Sampson was the leader of a coven.
Sampson had travelled more than most as a healer, so her accusations were from varied areas.
Those she accused included: Barbara Napier,Richard Graham, and Effie McCaylan.
Duncan also accused John Fian, a schoolmaster.
Arrested 20th December 1590, and charged with 20 counts of witchcraft and high treason.
Tortured to reveal his coven: head twisted with rope, needles under fingernails and boots.
His refusal to confess meant more extensive torture.
Accused of the same events as Sampson, including: the casting of a cat into sea, treason against James, sorcery and witchcraft etc.
John Fian features in ’Newes from Scotland’, but no evidence to suggest he had any involvement in magic.
Well educated, rare, owned and taught from Latin and Greek texts, maybe possessed some hidden knowledge.
The role of the King and Torture
James 24 in 1590, experiences made him a suspicious person: childhood marked by political crisis (murder of father, Lord Darnley, forced abdication and exile of mother, Mary Queen of Scots, etc), had reasons to fear nobility and dangerous conspiracies.
Brought up by Calvinist tutors, appeased Catholic nobility.
As the accused had been charged with attempting to harm him and his new Queen, he took personal interest.
Sampsons case brought reason to storms him and Anne had faced.
James approved torture of accused and questioned many himself after Sampson stated the Devil had told her the King and all of Scotland would be destroyed.
Given his concerns with plots against himself, as well as his genuine belief in divine right of King’s, his enthusiasm can be more easily understood.
His involvement also assisted his political cause, ‘Newes from Scotland’ presented him as a godly Protestant who was concerned with defending his people from the same threats faced by the English.
At the end, the author concludes James was protected from the witches because he was a devout Christian.
His passion was undermined in the case of Barbara Napier, who was initially acquitted. James arranged for the jurors to be tried for their error.
James approved of all torture: Duncan subject to horrendous torture from David Seaton, Sampson had thumbscrews, boots and cords.
In Scotland torture could only be used if sanctioned by the Privy council, but James’ involvement ensured it was used widely.
The involvement of the Earl of Bothwell
Francis Stewart, first cousin of James.
Was trusted to become James’ military commander and member of the Privy council, rising to the office of the Lord High Admiral.
He became involved in a number of plots: 1583, tried to oust royal favourite, the Earl of Arran and was placed under house arrest; 1587, openly criticised James for not preventing the execution of Mary Queen of Scots; 1589, found guilty of treason.
Unlikely that Sampson knew Bothwell, but did confess that she’d asked her divine how long James would live, and to predict what would happen after his death.
Richard Graham also accused Bothwell of being involved in the conspiracy.
Bothwell was arrested 15th April 1591 and held at Edinburgh Castle.
James had a clear dislike for Bothwell, but he may have had genuine reason to believe that he was involved.
As an admiral, Bothwell had suggested that James make the journey to collect Anne himself, automatically implicating him.
James in fear of Bothwell.
April 1591, Bothwell was summoned before the Privy Council. He strongly denied any involvement, but was held at Edinburgh Castle to await trial.
He escaped in June and entered Holyrood Castle to reconcile with James. Before this, a royal proclamation had been issued, publicly accusing Bothwell of being in league with the Devil, depriving him of all titles and declaring him an outlaw.
Spent next months in hiding, James tried to pursue him.
April 1592, the Privy Council found him guilty of witchcraft.
June he made another attempt to capture the King, accompanied by more armed supporters, before fleeing again, and between July and October 1592, many of Bothwell’s supporters were charged.
As the net closed around him, Bothwell took the decision on 24th July 1593 to enter James’ chamber at Holyrood to plead with the king in person.
James attempted to flea to the Queen’s bedroom.
James was supposed to have remarked what they could kill him, but could never take his soul.
His fear of Bothwell was as a magician.
Although James was left shaken by the incident, he seems to have been convinced of Bothwell’s innocence.
Bothwell received an officialpardon and in August a farcical trial was held to clear Bothwell of the original witchcraft charges.
Bothwell seems to have had the upper hand during his trial, he persuaded James of his innocence and he now filled Edinburgh with his armed supporters as a show of strength.
Defended himself, and presented the accusations as a deliberate attempt to politically undermine him.
He threatened to have witnesses who could testify that they were threatened with torture if they did not implicate him in the plot against James.
Fearful of Bothwell’s growing influence, James withdrew his pardon and proclaimed that Bothwell would have to go into exile and was forbidden from approaching the king again.
Bothwell attempted one last uprising and joined a group of rebels in Linlithgow.
They attacked the kings forces at Leith March 1594.
Unsuccessful, so he withdrew to the English boarder , spent time in France, Spain and Italy before dying in Naples in 1612.
Impact of the confessions, trials and executions
Judicial proceedings against the suspected witches began 1590 and lasted 3 years.
70 people implicated in total, the initial arrests took place November 1590 and trials began January 1591.
Number of the accused fled to England, James instructed Seaton to recapture them.
At least one woman was tracked and extradited to Scotland, where she was tortured and confessed more names.
The fate of the most high profile witches is known: Gilly Duncan (hanged), John Fian (executed and burned), Agnes Sampson (same as Fian), Barbara Napier’s (execution cancelled when she was pregnant), Effie McCaylan (declared innocence).
Some also accused are: Margaret Acheson (Napier and Sampson), Meg Bogtourn.