Barry Sugarman (1970) argues that middle and working-class subcultures contain different attitudes and orientations, including fatalism, immediate gratification, present time orientation, and collectivism
JWB Douglas (1964, 1970) conducted a longitudinal study on 5362 British children, finding that length in education was related to class, with parental interest in a child's schooling being an important factor
Tessa Blackstone and Jo Mortimore (1994) suggest that working-class parents may have less time to attend school due to their jobs and the way teachers treat them
Gillian Evans (2007) notes that working-class parents aspire for their children to do well in school for a better future, rejecting the cultural deprivation theory
Working-class pupils tend to use the restricted code, which is informal spoken English with colloquialisms, idiomatic phrases, non-standard grammar, and simplistic sentence structure
Keddie (1973) suggests that there is no cultural deprivation, only a cultural difference, and emphasizes the need for schools to recognize and cater to both types
Complementary education aims to replace the culture that the working class may lack, with programs like Sesame Street and Sure Start providing ways to transmit attitudes, skills, and values
Some research validity is questionable, like Blackstone and Mortimore (1994) where data may reflect teachers' perceptions rather than actual parental interests
Bernstein's distinction between working and middle-class language has been criticized for oversimplifying the differences and implying one culture is superior to another