Social influence is the process by which an individual’s attitudes, beliefs or behavior are modified by the presence or action of others
Four areas of social influence are conformity, compliance, obedience, and minority influence
Conformity, a type of social influence, is defined as a change in belief or behavior in response to real or imagined social pressure, also known as majority influence
Types of Conformity:
Compliance: publicly agreeing with a group but privately disagreeing
Internalisation: publicly changing behavior to fit in with the group while also agreeing with them privately
Identification: conforming to the demands of a given social role in society
Normative social influence is where a person conforms to fit in with the group because they don’t want to appear foolish or be left out, usually associated with compliance
Informational social influence is where a person conforms because they have a desire to be right and look to others who they believe may have more information
Jenness’ Bean Jar Experiment:
Participants estimated the number of beans in a jar individually and then as a group
Showed majority influence and informational social influence
Participants' estimates converged towards a similar value in the group setting
Asch's Line Study:
Investigated conformity to the majority in situations where an answer was obvious
Participants conformed on 32% of critical trials where confederates gave wrong answers
Lack of ecological validity and sampling issues were noted in the study
Factors Affecting Conformity:
Group Size: Conformity increases with group size up to a certain point, optimal group size is around 3-5 people
Group Unanimity: Conformity is higher when all group members agree
Difficulty of Task: Conformity increases with task difficulty
Answer in Private: Conformity decreases when participants can answer privately
Social roles are the part people play as members of a social group, and there is considerable pressure to conform to the expectations of a social role, known as identification
Stanford Prison Experiment by Zimbardo:
Investigated how readily people would conform to the social roles of guard and prisoner in a simulated prison environment
Showed the powerful influence of social roles on behavior
Zimbardo's Stanford Prison Experiment:
Procedure: Zimbardo converted a basement of the Stanford University psychology building into a mock prison
Participants: students assigned as prisoners or guards in a simulated prison environment
Findings: guards quickly adopted a brutal and sadistic behavior, while prisoners became submissive and adopted prisoner-like behavior
Evaluation of Zimbardo's Study:
Demand characteristics could explain the findings, as most guards later claimed they were simply acting
The study may lack ecological validity and population validity, limiting its generalizability to real-life prison settings and other populations
The study led to changes in US prisons, such as separating juveniles accused of federal crimes from adult prisoners
Milgram's Shock Study:
Procedure: participants were assigned as a teacher (true participant) or learner (confederate) and administered electric shocks
Results: 65% of participants were willing to administer shocks up to 450 volts
Evaluation: lacked ecological validity and had a biased sample of only males
Ethical Issues in Milgram's Study:
Deception: participants believed they were shocking a real person, leading to stress and potential psychological harm
Protection of participants: exposed to extremely stressful situations, some experiencing seizures and distress
Milgram debriefed participants fully after the experiment and followed up to ensure no lasting harm
Agency Theory:
People obey an authority when they believe the authority will take responsibility for the consequences of their actions
Supported by aspects of Milgram's evidence, where reminders of personal responsibility decreased obedience
Milgram's experiment variations:
Milgram varied the basic procedure to identify which situational factors affected obedience (the DV)
Obedience was measured by how many participants shocked to the maximum 450 volts (65% in the original study)
Authority Figure Wearing a Uniform:
Milgram's experimenter (Mr. Williams) wearing a laboratory coat gave him high status
When the experimenter dressed in everyday clothes, obedience was very low
Status of Location:
Milgram's obedience experiment at Yale University had high credibility and respect, increasing obedience
When the experiment was moved to run-down offices, obedience dropped to 47.5%
Proximity of Authority Figure:
People are more likely to obey an authority figure who is in close proximity
Obedience fell to 20.5% when the experimenter instructed the teacher by telephone from another room
Adorno proposed the concept of an authoritarian personality, favoring an authoritarian social system and admiring obedience to authority figures
Characteristics include hostility towards those of inferior status and obedience to high-status individuals
Resistance to Social Influence:
Independent behavior describes behavior not influenced by others, resisting pressures to conform or obey
Social Support:
Presence of a dissident (non-conforming confederate) decreases conformity levels in true participants, providing social support and confidence in their decisions
Locus of Control:
Internal locus of control individuals feel personal control over their behavior, less conforming and obedient
External locus of control individuals attribute behaviors to external influences or luck
Minority Influence:
Minority influence occurs when a small group influences the opinion of a larger group
Consistency, commitment, and flexibility are key behaviors for minority influence
Social Change:
Social change involves a whole society adopting a new belief or behavior, often influenced by minority influence, internal locus of control, and disobedience to authority
Social change is often a result of minority influence, where a small group persuades the majority to adopt their point of view
Independent behavior is linked to minority influence, as the minority resists pressures to conform and/or obey
Committed minorities, especially those who risk themselves for their cause, influence the majority through the augmentation principle, where the majority values the importance of the cause
The snowball effect occurs when more of the majority gradually change towards the cause, ultimately resulting in societal change
Once social change happens, social cryptomnesia occurs, where people remember the change but not how it came about
Moscovici found that consistency is crucial for the minority to be influential, as it creates uncertainty among the majority
In Moscovici's study, a consistent minority group had a greater effect on other participants than an inconsistent group, confirming the importance of consistency in minority influence
A snowball effect begins when the minority persuades people to their way of thinking, leading more to adopt the minority opinion until it becomes the majority opinion
Crypto amnesia is when the minority opinion becomes the dominant position in society, and people often do not remember where the opinion originated from
Minority influence can lead to social change through committed minorities and the snowball effect, ultimately resulting in the minority opinion becoming the dominant position in society