Gorbachev in power 1985. economy was already declining
weakness highlighted in Novosibirsk report of 1983
Gorbachev trial and error which sent economy into chaos
INITIAL REFORMS
reformers brought into party and conservatives dismissed = Romanov dismissed, Yeltsin and Yakolev promoted
Attacks on Alcohol
aimed to increase productivity
ppl turned up to work drunk
“we can’t build communism on vodka”
legal age raised to 21
cost of vodka tripled
RESULTS OF ALCOHOL CAMPAIGN
good at first
declined
money that the govt would have gotten from alcohol buy (15% of all household income) caused money loss
drinking levels rose as illegal alcohol moonshine was sold in bulk and unhygienic conditions
TWELFTH FIVE YEAR PLAN
focus on science and engineering
RESULTS
too much spending on construction
equipment broke
industry slow to adapt to new tech
focus on quantity over quality
JUST MADE GORBACHEV LOOK WORSE.
war with afghanistan cost a lot
bankrupt
ECONOMIC PERESTROIKA 1987
restructuring of the economy through market mechanisms and private enterprise to help economy after the twelfth five year plan
joint ventures = mcdonald’s 1990
Law on state enterprises =managers choose what they want to produce as long as targets met
co-operatives legalised = flourishing restaurants
IMPACTS OF PERESTROIKA 1987
food production increased to 2% by 1987. inadequate
criminal gangs seized the opportunity to make more money through moonshine
1990 = 3000 joint foreign ventures but they had little economic impact
fall in oil price. USSR relied on oil as it was what they used as foreignexchange
ECONOMY IN DEBT. NO CONSUMER GOODS. STRIKES DUE TO UNPAID WORK AND NO FOOD.
threatened his position
STATE COMMISSION ON ECONOMIC REFORM:
move to a market led economy
politburo divided
reformers wanted to implement quickly whereas others did not
economy collapsed
perestroika led to economic catastrophe
WHY DID Gorbachev‘s GLASNOST NEED TO BE DONE?
under Brezhnev the party was competing within itself. this lead to corruption and nepotism
Gorbachev realised that the whole system needed reform
this would also add the benefit of removing officials against reform
Criticisms under Glasnost
complaints about poor housing
investigations of soviet history revealed Stalin’s mass terrors and the famine of the 1930s
the Soviet victory in the second world war criticised for wasting human lives
environmental damage due to irrigation schemes
the Chernobyl accident and glasnost
1986
provided justification that glasnost needed to be done
radioactivity that led to leukaemia and birth defects
AFTER GLASNOST
soviet population more politicised
over 60,000 groups adding voices toward political reform
didn’t provide support for G.
wave of criticism against the party directed at Gorbachev
reformers even didn’t support the party even though they were members
reformers resigned
GORBACHEV’S ATTEMPTED REFORMS OF PARTY
separate the party and state -> 1988->officials didn’t choose either-> lines had become blurred due to nomenklatura system as some people had positions in both
shift power from party to the Soviets -> more finance to them to support them -> deputies elected for 5 yrs rather than 2 for more job security
Streamlining the party -> central comm reduced from 20 to 9
clampdown on corruption-> Brezhnev’s son in law was sentenced to 12 years imprisonment -> removing corruption was popular with the people but created resentment in party
moves toward democratisation
1987 wanted ballots for multiple candidates
practice elections
1988 announced that the move to multi candidate elections would extend nationally with the election of the congress of people’s deputies
the impact of Gorbachev’s failure to reform the Party
increasing divisions -> alienated both liberals and conservative. Gorbachev could not find a middle point so it undermined his authority
alienating the reformers and conservatives. Disagreements between Yeltsin and Gorbachev. he openly attacked Gorbachev’s approach to reform as slow. he got sacked 1988
development of factions. Yeltsin formed a group within the party as a reformer
the abolition of article 6. the article talked about being a one party state. critics attacked as they wanted democracy
ENDING OF ARTICLE 6
people wanted democracy
Gorbachev ended the Party’s monopoly on power
1990-> Communist party was powerless
Gorbachev decided that the USSR should not intervene in the affairs of other socialist countries, ending the Brezhnev Doctrine's control over Eastern Europe
After the funeral of Soviet leader Chernenko in 1985, Gorbachev met with leaders of the Eastern European communist regimes and informed them about the new policy of non-intervention, allowing them to find their own path of socialism
Supporting satellite states was expensive, costing the USSR 40 billion a year, which Gorbachev believed could be better used to promote domestic reform
Gorbachev hoped that by letting the satellite states choose their own path to socialism, they would also lead economic reforms
consequences of ending the Brezhnev doctrine
collapse of communist regimes in eastern Europe
POLAND - solidarity workers organisation beat the communist party in elections. Gorbachev approved on the own decision
EAST GERMANY - they were created under WW2. relied on soviet support. Gorbachev visited and encouraged reform. chaos. knocked down the Berlin wall which was a symbol for the old war in europe
what encouraged nationalism?
insecurity of party leaders who felt threatened by Gorbachev’s reforms due to their own corruption. Brezhnev left their corruption alone due to “trust in Cadres” but Gorbachev threatened their lifestyle
Culture and language. 1980s there were nearly equal russian to non russian ratio. in the non russians their were the Baltic's and some muslim groups who had strong senses of identity within their own culture and language.
the Baltic republics
estonia Latvia lithuania
used to be independent before the USSR and people remembered that
resurgence of feelings for nationalist identity
limits of nationalism
the only republic where there was huge nationalism issue was Georgia. everywhere else had little demands for independence before given the option to
the Soviet union had allowed a degree of autonomy beforehand through supporting their own languages in schools
the role of russian nationalism in the collapse of the USSR
Yeltsin elected as chairman of the Russian supreme soviet in March 1990
Yeltsin happy to encourage nationalism as a method to undermine Gorbachev
AGAINST GORBACHEV
naive -> did not think of consequences of his policies. naive assumptions about the impact. level of resistance within party more than expected. e.g GLASNOST and ending of the Brezhnev doctrine and article 6
power base -> his measures to reduce power of the party left him as a leader exposed. he was attacking the base of his own power. he refused to be in the popular election of 1990 where he would have won. Yeltsin on the other hand used popular elections to his benefit
IN DEFENCE OF GORBACHEV
did not intend to bring the communist state down
when he came into power the economy was already declining
the previous mistakes of his predecessors put him in a tough position
he avoided force to impose his will
there were factors he had no control of like the war with afghanistan that Brezhnev agreed on
ROLE OF YELTSIN IN THE COLLAPSE
used his time after being sacked to establish links with critics of gorbachev
used opportunities to appeal to the public for sympathy
1991, 200,000 people gathered to support Yeltsin
legitimacy that Gorbachev didn’t have through him being elected as mayor of moscow.
encouraged nationalism movements to undermine Gorbachev
AUGUST COUP 1991
Gorbachev on holiday
an emergency committee was formed to rule in his absence as at a press conference it was announced that G was ill