Defined under s.1 of the Criminal Attempts Act 1981, the maximum sentence for an attempt is the same as for the main offence
According to Criminal Attempts Act s.1(1), if a person, with intent to commit an offence, does an act that is more than merely preparatory to the offence, they are guilty of attempting to commit that offence
Actus Reus (AR) for attempted crimes is an act that goes beyond mere preparation for the commission of the offence
Mens Rea (MR) for attempted crimes requires the intent to commit the specific offence
In the case of White, lacking factual causation for murder led to a conviction for attempted murder
AR cases like Gullefer were not attempted crimes as the actions were only preparatory, not an actual attempt to steal
Boyle and Boyle's case showed that damaging a door was considered attempting to burgle, as they had embarked on the crime proper
In Campbell's case, having glasses and an imitation weapon was not considered an attempt to rob
G’s reference case highlighted that attempting rape required embarking on the crime proper
Geddes' case illustrated that not completing the full offence meant it was not an attempted crime
The court assesses if the individual has moved from planning to execution and if they are actively trying to commit the offence
In Tosti's case, attempting to burgle was confirmed when he went beyond mere preparation, such as examining a padlock
MR cases like Whybrow established that for attempted murder, the defendant must have the intent to kill, as intent to cause grievous bodily harm is not sufficient
Conditional intent is when someone intends to do something if a certain condition is satisfied
Attempting the impossible is still punishable, as seen in cases like Shivpuri, where attempting to deal drugs with a substance other than cocaine was still considered an attempt