Rural areas which cause the most amount of conflict are:
National Parks
The Urban-rural fringe
Greenbelts
National governments and planners Viewpoint:
More likely to have a perceived sense of a rural place rather than a lived experience, so the needs of the local community might not be met
Development plans will be carefully considered due to the government’s responsibility to protect rural areas for future generations (e.g. National Parks)
Local governments Viewpoint:
The long-term health of the local economy and the traditions and heritage of the area are more likely to be considered by members of the local government
These members are more likely to have a lived experience of the place they work in
Local residents viewpoint:
Residents may have a lengthy lived experience of a place, with multiple generations having lived there
Some residents will welcome regeneration, especially if they will benefit from it
Some residents will not want the area to change, especially if the regeneration plan is not sympathetic to the character of the area
Local businesses viewpoint:
Will encourage a regeneration scheme that will expand their market and customer base
A new development will be viewed more positively if it involves the local business community in the decision-making process
Local businesses may view a development project negatively if it increases competition in the area
Second home owners and visitors Viewpoint:
People who are regular visitors or own a second home in a rural area, will have a different lived experience to the locals
Visitors and holiday home owners are mostly seasonal (over the summer months), so may favour regeneration projects that improve their experience over that time period