L4: Animal studies of attachment

Cards (12)

  • Lorenz (1952) - imprinting
    procedure: randomly divided clutch of goose eggs; half hatched in natural env. with mother, other half hatched in incubator (first saw Lorenz)
    findings: incubator group followed Lorenz everywhere (control followed mother goose)
  • Imprinting is when bird species which are mobile from birth (e.g., geese; ducks) attach to and follow the first moving object they see.
  • Lorenz's critical period
    • critical period when imprinting neds to take place
    • can be as brief as a few hrs after hatching (birth)
    If imprinting doesn't occur in this period: chicks didn't attach themselves to a mother fig.
  • sexual imprinting
    • Lorenz investigated relationship between imprinting and adult mate preferences
    Lorenz (1952) case study
    • peacock reared in zoo reptile house -> first large moving obj. they saw after hatching was giant tortoise
    • adult -> peacock directed courtship towards giant tortoises
    The peacock had undergone sexual imprinting.
  • Harlow (1958): contact comfort
    procedure: 16 baby rhesus monkeys reared with two wire 'mothers'
    1. plain-wire
    2. cloth-covered
    In both conditions the wire mothers dispensed milk.
    findings: rhesus monkeys cuddled cloth mother when frightened regardless which one dispensed milk
    This shows contact comfort was more important to the monkeys than food in terms of attachment behaviour
  • maternally deprived monkeys as adults
    • followed rhesus monkeys into adulthood: investigate whether this early maternal deprivation had a permanent effect
    findings:
    • reared with plain-wire: most dysfunctional
    Even those reared with a cloth mother didn't develop normal social behaviour.
    • more aggressive
    • less sociable
    • bred less than normal monkeys; unskilled at mating
    When they became mothers:
    • neglected their young
    • others attacked their children - sometimes killing
  • Harlow's critical period
    • mother fig. had to be intro. to rhesus monkey within 90 days for attachment to form
    • after: attachment impossible; damage done by deprivation is irreversible
  • strength (Lorenz): research support
    point: support for concept of imprinting
    evidence: Regolin and Vallortigara (1995) -> chicks exposed to shape combinations which moved (e.g., triangle with rectangle in front)
    -> range shown to chicks: followed original most closely
    explain: this is a strength b/c it supports the view that young animals are born with mechanism to imprint on first moving object they see (as Lorenz proposed).
    -> + credibility to Lorenz's research
    link: strength - research support b/c increased validity
  • limitation (Lorenz): generalisability to humans
    point: ability to generalise findings and conclusions to human attachment
    evidence: mammalian attachment system very different and more complex than birds
    -> e.g., attachment two-way process in mammals; not just young who attach to mothers, mothers have emotional attachment to their young
    explain: limitation b/c it means that Lorenz's research has little explanatory power for human attachment and so it isn't appropriate to generalise the findings to humans.
    link: limitation - generalisability b/c low credibility
  • strength (Harlow): real-world application
    point: practical value in social care
    evidence: Howe (1998) - Harlow's research helped social workers understand risk factors in child neglect + abuse -> can intervene to prevent it
    -> also helped care of captive monkeys; understand importance of proper attachment figs. (baby monkeys in zoos; breeding programs in wild)
    explain: strength b/c it shows how Harlow's research has influenced society.
    link: strength - real world application b/c has +ve implications for future + economy
  • limitation: ethical issues
    point: breached protection from harm
    evidence: monkeys taken from natural mothers soon after birth; distress from being in cages/social isolation
    explain: limitation b/c Rhesus monkeys considered similar enough to humans -> can generalise findings to humans -> suffering considered human-like
    link: limitation - ethical issues with key study of attachment
  • counter-argument (Harlow - ethical issues)
    • cost-benefit analysis of research would've been taken place
    • although monkeys were distressed: Harlow's research valuable to scientific community
    • findings informed child-rearing practices across the world