deck expp

Subdecks (1)

Cards (284)

  • Scientific Methodology
    Consists of the scientific techniques we use to collect and evaluate data
  • Commonsense Psychology
    • Nonscientific data gathering
    • Nonscientific Inference
  • Stereotyping: Falsely assuming that specific behaviors cluster together, ignoring individual differences
  • Nonscientific Inference
    • Gambler’s fallacy
    • Overuse of trait explanations
    • Stereotyping
    • Overconfidence
  • Scientific Mentality
    Assumes that behavior follows a natural order and can be predicted
  • Social Contagion: Most parsimonious cause of bulimia
  • Main Tools of Psychological Science
    • Observation
    • Measurement
    • Experimentation
  • Four Main Objectives of Science
    • Description
    • Prediction
    • Explanation
    • Control
  • Overuse of Trait Explanations: Making unwarranted dispositional attributions and under-use situational information can reduce the accuracy of our explanations and predictions
  • Good Thinking: Critical to the scientific method, systematic, objective, and rational
  • Sir Karl Popper: 'Proposed that science advances by revising theories based on the “weight of evidence”'
  • Basic Research: Tests theories and explains psychological phenomena, expanding knowledge
  • Theory
    Interim explanation of law; a set of related statements used to explain and predict phenomena
  • Empirical Data
    Data that are observed or experienced
  • Replication: An exact or systematic repetition of a study, increases confidence in experimental results
  • Gambler’s Fallacy: People misuse data to estimate the probability of an event, like when a slot machine will pay off
  • Law: Consists of statements generally expressed as equations with few variables that have overwhelming empirical support
  • Overconfidence Bias: Tendency to hold a false and misleading assessment of our skills, intellect, or talent, resulting in erroneous conclusions
  • Data
    The facts we gather using scientific methods
  • Parsimony: The principle of preferring the simplest useful explanation
  • Principle of Modus Tollens: Allows us to disprove statements using a single, contrary observation
  • Applied Research: Addresses real-world problems like improving student graduation rates
  • Experiment
    Attempts to establish a cause-and-effect relationship between the antecedent conditions (IV) and subject behavior (DV)
  • Confidentiality means data are securely stored and only used for the purpose explained to the subject
  • Deception may be used to obtain information but not to minimize participants' perception of risk or exaggerate potential benefits
  • Ethics help researchers identify actions considered good and bad
  • Ethical concerns or technological limitations may prevent experimentation
  • Pseudoscience is any field of study that gives the appearance of being scientific but has no true scientific basis and has not been confirmed using the scientific method
  • Informed Consent involves a subject or guardian agreeing in writing to participation after relevant details of the experiment have been explained
  • Cause-and-effect relationship
    • Not always possible because predictions must be testable
    • We must be able to manipulate the independent variable to measure its effect on the dependent variable
  • Confederates are experimenter's accomplices used in experiments
  • Subjects must be allowed to withdraw from experiments at any time without coercion
  • Research Ethics is a framework of values within which research is conducted
  • APA Ethical Guidelines apply to psychologists and students when assuming the role of psychologists during research or practice
  • Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) evaluate research proposals to ensure they follow ethical standards and protect the safety of research participants
  • Psychology experiments
    Control extraneous variables to measure "what we intend to measure"
  • The Belmont Report outlines principles of research ethics: Respect for persons, Beneficence, Justice
  • Anonymity means subjects are not identified by name
  • Minimal Risk Studies do not increase the likelihood of injury
  • Not all prior events are causes