The role and purpose of the education system according to Functionalism
Education promotes social solidarity by sharing norms and values
The whole is more important than the individual
History teaches shared values and interests
School is a mini society where children learn to fit in
Rules, hierarchies, exams, assemblies help in this process
School rules and punishments reflect crime and justice
Education teaches specialized skills for jobs
Schools support the smooth running of society
Keywords related to Functionalism in education
Value consensus
Specialized labor
Society in miniature
Homogeneity
Whole more important than individual
The stratification/class system prevents equality in education
IQ and ability are not linked with achievement; money and power play a role
Althusser views schools as replacing the church as the main agent of ideological control
Marxist perspective on education
Schools replaced church as the main agent of ideological control
Prepares individuals for their roles in the workplace
School is seen as an agent of exploitation and oppression
Bowles & Gintis (1976) discuss the Correspondence Theory in schooling in capitalist USA
Davis and Moore (1967) mention sifting, sorting, and grading in schools
Social class prevents the education system from sifting and grading according to ability
Resistance to authority is present in education due to the illusion of equality of opportunity
Schools teach students to be hardworking and obedient to not challenge authority in the workplace
There is a myth of meritocracy in education based on social background rather than ability
Most people are aware of the inequality in education and do not believe society is fair
Students who conform receive higher rewards than those who are creative and independent
Willis-Criticisms
Blackedge & Hunt
1984
Sample is too small - Willis
Postmodernists believe in changing job market, decline in manufacturing and traditional w/c manual work
Small scale study unrepresentative, cannot generalise
Since 1977 there are few jobs in manual work, therefore many such ‘lads’ stay on longer
Willis ignores other cultures within the school
Working class kids get w/c jobs
Dealing with boredom, monotony and authority = same as the workplace
Counter school culture / Anti school subculture
‘Lads’ and ‘earoles’ (Boffins)
Paul Willis: 'Learning to Labour'
Rejection of school prepares the ‘lads’ for rejection in their low status jobs
Differs to Bowles and Gintis’ study in the way that the lads made a conscious decision to mess around (not subservient to school)
New Right agree with functionalists- Education should socialise pupils into shared values and provide a sense of national identity
Bourdieu 1977: 'Cultural Reproduction'
Cultural Capital
Refers to the knowledge, skills, education, and similar characteristics that are used to make social distinctions and that are associated with differences in social status
Reproduction takes place via the socialisation of the young. In effect MC kids grow up to have MC jobs.. Who have more kids who grow up to be MC ... etc
Chubb and Moe believe state education has failed lower class and EM groups- it is inefficient and fails to meet the needs of the economy. Private schools deliver better education because the parents and students are consumers. Need to introduce Marketisation. Tests, exams and league tables will improve competition. Has influenced both conservative and New labour education policy
Gerwitz and Ball believe competition between schools benefits m/c who can use their cultural capital
Feminism believes school and education reproduces patriarchy
Haywood and Mac an Ghaill 1996: 'Schools reinforce gender identities- tell boys off for being girls and ignore boys verbal abuse of girls'
Boys are pushed into Science, Maths, Business and ICT while girls are pushed into English, Arts, Social Sciences, Design. Teachers take more interest in male achievement and are more attached to boys, pushing girls into lower status jobs