judicial review - hearing in admin court of kbd high court - judge reviews the lawfulness of a deciison or action
judicial review is only used if there is no other effective means of challenging
role of kbd admin court - review the case and see if law was applied correctly and correct procedures followed - if decided that a public body is refusing to do something it should or is doing something ultra vires
ultra vires - beyond its power
if an action is found ultra vires it will be declared void
public body refusing to do something the court can order it to comply
use of judicial review is only avalibel against a public body - exercising its function as a public body
judicial review deals with public law - any private law must be dealth with under tort
who can bring an action - person with an interest
locus standi - c has a connection to case
ultra vires must be brought to court within 3 months of original decision
grounds - illegality - fairness - irrationality and proportionatality
illegality - public body can only do what parent act allows them to do
any action that is unlawful will then be declared void
substantiaitve - beyond powers
procedural - if not followed correct precedent
fairness - public body should sue powers fairly - not be biased - given a fair hearing
irrationality and proportionatality - decision could be considered irrational - wednesbury
irrationality and hr - only needs to be proportionate - judge balence legitimate aim of state and individual aim
procedural - ayelsbury mushrooms - not following procedure
substantiatitive - r v secrertary of state - job centre v ann summers - allows something act didn't intend
unreasonableness - wednesbury - rodgers v swindon trust
remedies - given by court to rectify issue
damages - compensation
quashing order - overturning public bodys actions
prohibiting order - stopping future events
injunction - preventing from doing something
mandatory order - court order making them follow the law
decleration - makes a decleration of the law or rights of participants