a change in interest rates by the central bank will cause a movement along the IS curve.
a change in interest rates is shown on the IS curve using firms and investment as the transmission mechanism
an aggregate demand shock will cause a shift of the IS curve, despite no change in interest rate
any change in parameter aside from a change in Interest Rate will cause a shift in the IS curve
the discovery of new technology cannot be shown through the IS curve
new technology cannot be shown on the IS curve, as there is no change to the output gap, as both potential and actual output increases
recently, government purchases have been about 20% GDP
In the Long-run, spending must be funded via taxes - Ricardian Equivalence
[[Ricardian Equivalence]] states that any change in G is met with a compensating change in C, so a does not change. this suggests fiscal policy does not work to increase output
the permenant income hypothesis states that consumption only depends on potential output
if there is Ricardian Equivalence and Permanent income hypothesis, the fiscal policy multiplier is 0
if there is pemanent income hypothesis but no Ricardian Equivalence, the fiscal pplicy multiplier is 1
if there is no permanent income hypothesis, and no Ricardian Equivalence, the fiscal policy multiplier is more than 1
microfoundations explain the microeconomic behaviour that explains the assumed demands of C, I, G, EX and IM
the two microfoundation theories are permanent income hypothesis and the life-cycle model of consumption
One microfoundation theory of the IS curve is permanent income hypothesis
permanent income hypothesis assumes that people will base their consumption of an average of their income over time, rather than on their current income
permanent income hypothesis involves maximising utility from consumption
the Life-Cycle model assumes that consumption is based on average lifetime income rather than income at any given age
in the long run, MPK = r
r is exogenous and time invariant
a microfoundation theory of the IS curve is the Life-cycle model of consumption
if MPK is less than Rt, firms should save and not invest in capital
when MPK is less than Rt, investment will decline
when MPK is higher than Rt, firms should borrow and invest in capital
when MPK is higher than Rt, investment will increase
if consumption also depends on temporary changes in income, a multiplier effect is produced
X bar is a parameter that determines how much consumption rises when the economy expands
the multiplier shows that changes to the original IS curve will have a higher impact on income
Investment is most variable, as interest rates fluctuate as well as long term potential output
the National Income Accounting Identity assumes output + imports = Consumption + investment+ government Purchases + exports
the national income accounting identity implies that total resources available to be used in the economy is equal to total uses
in Alaska, an unexpected income through a tax refund causes consumption to change, while changes to the permanent income does not impact consumption, as they are announced 6 months before they are released
permanent income hypothesis holds in Alaska, where consumers respond differently to different changes in income
potential output is denoted with Y bar
potential output is smoother than actual GDP
shocks to income are smoothed to keep consumption steady, and shocks to actual output do not change potential output
the Ricardian Equivalence is analgous to the permanent income hypothesis
the Ricardian Equivalence states that the timing of tax changes does not matter for consumer behaviour
the ricardian equivalence states that the present value of government tax collection determines behaviour