What is the evaluation of social learning theory
. Principles of SLT have been applied to increases our understanding of how many areas of human behaviour including criminal behaviour
. For example Akers suggests that the priv aloft of someone engaging in criminal behaviour increases when they are exposed to models who commit crime, identify with these models and develop the expectations of positive consequences for their own criminal behaviour
. Ulrich supports this claim in a revenue of literature finding that the strongest cause of violent behaviour in adolescence was association with delinquent peer groups, where violence was both modelled and rewarded
+ support for identification
. According to SLT observing a model similar to the self should lead to more learning than observing a dissimilar model
. Greater identification with a model leads to more learning because it is easier to visualise the self in place of the model so the observer feels as if he or she is having the sane experience
. Fox and Bailenson found evidence for using computer generated virtual humans engaging in exercise
or merely loitering. The models looked either similar or dissimilar to participants. Participants who viewed their virtual model engaged in more exercise in 24 hours than those who saw their model loitering or a model dissimilar to them
. A major criticism of SLT explanations of deviant behaviour relates to its principle concept that increased association with deviant peers increases the likelihood that an individual will adopt the same values and behaviours
. The problem with this is essentially problem determining causality
. Siegel & McCornick suggest that people who posses deviant attitudes and values would seek out peers with similar attitudes and behaviours, as they are more fun to be with than less reckless counterparts
. Only focuses on processes of social learning theory not other potential influences
. E.g. gender, media and locus of control
. Difficult to show one thing can influence behaviour