Is economic growth in other countries good or bad for our nation?
It may be good for our nation because it means larger markets for our exports. It may mean increased competition for our exporters
Is growth in a country more or less valuable when that nation is part of a closely integrated world economy?
It should be more valuable when a country can sell some of its increased production to the world market. It is less valuable when the benefits of growth are passed on to foreigners rather than retained at home
1. Are downward sloping - if you have less cloth, then you must have more food to be equally satisfied
2. Lie farther from the origin make consumers more satisfied - they prefer having more of both goods
3. Become flatter when they move to the right - with more cloth and less food, an extra yard of cloth becomes less valuable in terms of how many calories of food you are willing to give up for it
1. The value of an economy's consumption equals the value of its production
2. The economy's choice of a point on the isovalue line depends on the tastes of its consumers, which can be represented graphically by a series of indifference curves
A tariff (subsidy) has the direct effect of raising the internal relative price of the imported (exported) good, which might have perverse effects on internal prices (Metzler paradox)
Disproportionately expands a country’s production possibilities in the direction of the good it imports, improving the country's terms of trade at the rest of the world's expense
International transfers of income may affect a country’s terms of trade by shifting the world relative demand curve due to changes in tastes, technology, and international transfers of income