Follow the model of Stalin's collectivisation in the USSR
More productive agriculture
Collectivisation and land reform:
Many farmers abandoned their farms - 13% of all farm land deserted
In 1958, a third of East German farms were collectivised
In the 50s and 60s, many farmers fled to West Germany. This led to food rationing being introduced in 1961
By 1962, 85% of farms were collectivised
In the 60s, consequences of not collectivising became more extreme - farmers weren't able to use state machinery, land was confiscated and farmers were arrested
Collectivisation and land reforms - success?
In a political sense, the Communist GDR government achieved its ideological aims
In the short term, it was a disaster. Many farmers fled to the West and food production declined
In the long term, collectivised farms did become more efficient. But the benefits of this only began to be felt in the 70s
The First Five Year Plan (1951)
Aims:
To gear the GDR towards heavy industry
Had ambitious aims, especially for heavy industry
Evaluation:
Goods produced were often of poor quality and weren't profitable
The state declared that between 1950 and 1959, industrial productivity levels rose by 100% - this stat doesn't consider profitability or quality
The First Five Year Plan (1951) - National and heavy industry:
The SED nationalised industries, making it easier to implement economic policies
Despite the lack of natural resources, the SED leaders set an ambitious aim to build up heavy industry
The emphasis of heavy industry was achieved at the expense of consumer goods. A more realistic alternative would have been to modernise the economy by investing in modern technologies and lighter industry
The First Five Year Plan - productivity:
To improve productivity levels, the gov introduced production targets. Also, the SED controlled discipline and social activities for workers
Despite the workers' legal rights and the promise of better working conditions, the quotas for productivity put pressure on the workforce
The Second Five Year Plan (1956)
Aims:
Produce more consumer goods and improve living standards
Combine the production of capital and consumer goods
What it did:
Put some stress on technological process
Backed the development of nuclear energy
Consumer goods were being produced and living standards improved
The Second Five Year Plan (1956) - evaluation:
Between 1956 and 1958, the economy grew by 12%
Workers benefitted from low food prices
The number of workers leaving for the West stabilised
Living standards improved, but rationing continued until 1958
Although the economy was growing, it wasn't matching the scale of growth in the west