Discuss research related to the effects of institutionalisation
> effects of intitutionalisation:
> physical underdevelopment
> disinhibited attachment
> intellectual underfunctioning
> Rutter and Sonuga-Barke studied 165 romanian orphans
> 111 adopted before age of 2, 54 adopted by age of 4
> compared to 52 british children adopted by 6 months
> children tested regularly for physical, social, cognitive development at ages of 4, 6, 11, 15
> findings - at time of adoption, romanian children were behind british children developmentally, by 4 most of the romanian children adopted by 6 months caught up with british children
> many children adopted after 6 months showed disinhibited attachment and had difficulties with peer relationships
> disinhibited attachments - no preference for parents or strangers, seeks comfort and attention from anyone
> followed group of british children from early life to asolescence, placed in institution at less than 4 months
> 70% not able to care deeply about anyone
> caretakes were not allowed to form attachments so children experienced privation
> children restored to families or adopted had problems with peer relationships, more quarrelsome, more likely to be bullies, some showed signs of disinhibited attachment
> early privation had negative effect on ability to form relationships even after given good emotional care
> supports bowlby's view that failure to form attachment in the sensitive period leads to irreversible effect on emotional development
> Research suppport by Quinton
> study on 50 women raised in institutions against control of 50 women raised at home
> when in their 20s, ex-institutionalised women experienced severe difficulty acting as parents - more of their children spent time in care
> Harlow research monkeys made bad mothers, killed their kids
> showed the importance of early adoption to ensure no developmental problems
> today most babies are adopted within first weeks of birth so do not experience deprivation, can attach to adoptive family
> institutions provide emotional care, positive impact on lives
> Rutter's study has low ecological validity
> the conditions of the romanian orphans were especially poor
> orphanages didnt provide any intellectual stimulation, poor physical living conditions, malnourishment, which may have had a large impact on intellectual development - confounding variables
> cases of abuse frequently reported
> findings cannot be generalised to all orphanages that treat children better, more holistic approach needed
> Study has high internal validity
> longitudinal study, no manipulated variables makes findings more reliable, no manipulation of variables means that a causal relationship cannot be identified
> LeMare and Audet research shows that effects may disappear after sufficient time with suitable quality care
> a less determinist approach is needed to encourage rehabilitation, encourages adoption of older children, help prevent a self fulfiling prophecy where parents have lower expectations of institutionalised children