A contract creates obligations on one or all parties involved.
The discharge of a contract happens when these obligations come to and end
Contracts are discharged by:
Performance
Frustration
Breach
Discharge by performance - The 'EntiretyRule'
This is where all the obligations under the contract have been met (Cutter v Powell)
Exceptions to the Entirety rule:
Divisible contracts
Prevention of performance
Substantial performance
Acceptance of part performance
Divisible contracts (Ritchie v Atkinson)
A contract is divisible when payment is due at various stages of performance, rather than in one lump sum when performance is compled
Price for each stage can be claimed when the stage is completed
Substantialperformance (Bolton v Mahadeva)
If a party done substantially what was required under the contract they can recover an amount appropriate to what has been done under the contract
Prevention of Performance (Planche v Colburn)
If the other party prevents a party from carrying out their obligations because of some act or omission
The party trying to perform may have an action or damages
Acceptance of part performance (Sumpter v Hedges)
Applied where one of the parties has performed the contract, but not completely
If the other side has shown willingness to accept the part performance, then the strict rule of the Entirety rule will not apply
Agreement must be reached without pressure
Time for performance
Usual rule is that a party performs their obligations, but not within the time stipulated in the contract:
Can claim damages for the delay
Cannot terminate the contract
Time for performance - Cancel contract
However sometimes Time is ' of the essence' so the innocent party is entitled to bring the contract to an end:
Where the parties have made an express stipulation in the contract that Time is of the essence
Where the surrounding circumstances show that Time of performance is critical
Where a new date is insisted upon after failure to comply
Frustration
If after a contract is made, something happens, through no fault of either party, to make its performance impossible, The contract is said to be frustrated
Frustration types:
Impossibility
Illegality
Commercial sterility
Impossibility (Taylor v Caldwell)
The contract is frustrated because performance has become impossible
Death of either party
Illegality - ( Re Shipton) - Has to become illegal not already illegal
Where after the contract is formed, a change jn the law makes its performance illegal
This can often happen in times of war when law may change rapidly and cause a contract to be frustrated
Commercialsterility - radical change of circumstances (Krell v Henry)
Where the commercialpurpose of the contract has disappeared because of the intervening event, The contract may be frustrated
Performance of the contract had to become pointless, even though it is still technically possible
When frustration cannot apply:
Self - induced frustration (Maritime)
Contract becomes less profitable (Amalgamated)
Foreseeable risk ( or when mentioned in the contract) - ( Davis Contractors)
Remedies for frustration:
Law Reform (Frustrated contractors) Act 1943
Ends contracts
Existing obligation still enforceable but future ones are not