1. Much inconsistency between attitudes and behaviour can be explained by cognitive dissonance
2. Situations which give rise to cognitive dissonance: Decision making, Forced compliance, Voluntary and involuntary exposure to dissonant information, Disagreement with others
We know that attitudes relate in some way to beliefs about the attitude object where belief is a statement which connects the attitude object with some other object, goal, or value
Multi-attribute or Expectancy value model (Fishbein)
Attitude (act) = ∑ b . e, Where A (act) = attitude to (act of purchasing) behaviour, b = strength of belief that behaviour will produce specific outcome, e = evaluation of attribute (e.g. Good to bad) Summed over n attributes
The greater our identification with a product, the more difficult it will be to change our attitudes to that product - we may screen out conflicting messages
Limitations of Model: Predictive power is poor, Assumes more (or less) is always better, The purchase/decision situation not directly taken into account, Social conformity pressures were not taken into account e.g. family, peer group, Other circumstances (situational, economic etc.) affect behaviour
Watch the McDonalds video and consider beliefs that brought about a more negative attitude. Think about changes in the brand and people's beliefs about the brand
Theory of Reasoned Action: B ≈ BI = W1(A) + W2(SN), B = Behaviour, BI = Behavioural Intent, A = Attitude to performing behaviour B, SN = subjective norm/social influence, W1 and W2 are weights
BI is the immediate antecedent to overt behaviour, It is different to behaviour: something may intervene to stop BI becoming Behaviour, BI can be more or less specific, The closer in time to the actual behaviour the BI is measured, the more accurately it is likely to predict behaviour, In trying to measure behaviour we are almost always measuring BI as usually we are asking people to indicate what they are likely to do rather than directly observing behaviour
In forming a subjective norm an individual takes into account the normative expectations of various others in the environment and considers whether specific individuals and groups think should engage in behaviour
Subjective norm refers specifically to the person’s perception that important others desire the performance/non-performance of a specific behaviour; this may or may not reflect what the important others actually think he should do
Strategies of Attitude Change: Change beliefs about existing brand, Change brand, Add a salient attribute, Change beliefs about competitor brand, Associate brand with admired object e.g. celebrity sponsorship (warning, be sure celebrity is admired by audience and beware celebrity letting you down), Associate competitor with negatives, Show two attitudes conflict and resolve by aligning with one
Phased decision strategies involve sequential use of at least two different decision rules as means of coping with a large amount of choice alternatives