Cards (7)

  • Leading question evaluation
    + Real life application
    • used in the criminal justice system
    • high external validity and generalisability
    - Sutherland et al.
    • participants were more accurate when asked misleading questions
    • contradicts Loftus and Palmer's study and suggests it is an incomplete explanation
    - Foster et al.
    • EWTs in real life have an important impact, but don't in studies so may not be as accurate
    • suggests Loftus and Palmer may be more pessimistic about EWT accuracy
  • Why leading questions affect memory
    Substitution bias: misleading information changes the participant's memory of the event
  • Loftus and Palmer study aim
    To investigate whether leading questions affect the accuracy of an eyewitness testimony
  • Loftus and Palmer study procedure
    • 45 participants watched clips of car accidents
    • then asked critical question about how fast cars were going
    • critical question used different words such as "smashed" or "contacted"
    • this critical question was the leading question or misleading information
    • participants' answers in mph were recorded
  • Loftus and Palmer study findings
    the critical question altered the participants' answers with some words making the estimate much higher. difference between "smashed" and "contacted" was 10 mph
  • Loftus and Palmer study conclusion
    misleading information can change people's perception of an event and therefore affect the accuracy of EWTs
  • Loftus and Palmer follow-up study
    found that participants who had critical question "smashed" were more likely to report broken glass when there was none present in the clip of the accident