participants were more accurate when asked misleading questions
contradicts Loftus and Palmer's study and suggests it is an incomplete explanation
- Foster et al.
EWTs in real life have an important impact, but don't in studies so may not be as accurate
suggests Loftus and Palmer may be more pessimistic about EWT accuracy
Why leading questions affect memory
Substitution bias: misleading information changes the participant's memory of the event
Loftus and Palmer study aim
To investigate whether leading questions affect the accuracy of an eyewitness testimony
Loftus and Palmer study procedure
45participants watched clips of car accidents
then asked critical question about how fast cars were going
critical question used different words such as "smashed" or "contacted"
this critical question was the leading question or misleading information
participants' answers in mph were recorded
Loftus and Palmer study findings
the critical question altered the participants' answers with some words making the estimate much higher. difference between "smashed" and "contacted" was 10 mph
Loftus and Palmer study conclusion
misleading information can change people's perception of an event and therefore affect the accuracy of EWTs
Loftus and Palmer follow-up study
found that participants who had critical question "smashed" were more likely to report broken glass when there was none present in the clip of the accident