A buyer who is willing to pay more for better value long term
5 generic competitive advantage strategies
broad low-cost
broad differentiation
Focused low-cost
Focused differentiation
Best-cost provider
Broad Low-Cost provider strategy
low costs than rivals on comparable products
not necessarily low price
broad spectrum of buyers
broad differentiation strategy
differentiating based on attributes to attract a broad audience
focused low cost strategy
niche target market at lower prices
focused differentiation
niche target market with a customized offering that meets needs better than rivals
Best-cost strategy
upscale product attributes at lower costs than rivals
more value for their money
hybrid - a blend of other 4 strategies
The chief difference between broad differentiation & focused is
size of buyer group the company is trying to appeal to
Year 1 = 10%, year 2 = 15%, the increase was
5% points, 5 points, 500 basis points, 50%, grew from 10% to 15%
Contribution margin analysis =
sales - variable costs
Contribution margin does NOT account for fixed costs
Special contract offers can be discounted significantly and still have a positive contribution margin because the cost of these sales can be assumed to exclude fixed overhead costs
Rival markets to attack
market leaders
runner-up firms
Struggling enterprises
Small local & regional firms
Blue Ocean Strategy
Simultaneous pursuit of differentiation and low cost to open a new market space with no competitors
Defensive Strategies will NOT
grow business
increase competitive advantage
Defensive strategy purpose
lower risk of being attack
weaken impact of attack
Induce challenges to aim efforts at rivals
Defensive strategy forms
block challengers
signal likelihood of strong retaliation
Offensive strategy
When a company spots opportunities to gain profitable market share at its rivals' expense OR when a company has no choice than to attack rival's competitive advantage
Purpose of offensives strategies
improve market position & performance
Offensive strategy principles
better product @ lower price
leapfrogging (first with next-generation products)
continuous innovation
disruptive innovation to create new markets
improving other company's goods
hit&run or guerrilla warfare
Preemptive strike
scope of a firm
range of internal activities & breadth of offering, extent of geographic presence, and mix of businesses
Horizontal scope
range of product & service segments that a firms serves
Vertical scope
extent to which the firm engages in various activities that make up the industry's value chain
Horizontal mergers combine...
2+ firms within the same market (usually under new name)
Horizontal acquisitions
one firm purchases the operations from another firm
Horizontal M&A benefits
improved effeciency
quick access to new products & geography
Increased bargaining power
Reducing rivalry
enhanced flexibility
Dynamic capabilities
Horizontal M&A fails because of
strategic issues
organization issues
Federal Trade Organization (FTC) & DOJ role
ensure no monopoly
Vertical integration
when a business increases the scope of what they do
vertical integration firm
participates in multiple stages of the supply chain
Vertical backward integration involves entry into activities previously performed by suppliers or other enterprises earlier in the value chain
Vertical forward integration
entry into value chain system closer to the end user
vertical integration disadvantages
increased risk
slow adoption to new methods
less flexibility to shift with preferences
unable to realize economies of scale
capacity-matching problems
need to develop new resources & capabilities
What does vertical integration not take into account?
hidden factory knowledge & relationships
The worst suppliers are often internal suppliers
Outsourcing
farming out value chain activities
2 types of partnerships
strategic alliance
joint venture
Strategic alliance partnership
formal agreement between 2+ companies in which they agree to work cooperatively toward a common objective
Joint Venture partnership
establishment of independent corporate entity that the partners own and control jointly, sharing revenues & expenses
Strategic offensives should, as a general rule, be based on
exploiting a company’s strongest competitive assets - its most valuable resources and capabilities