human beings are self-determining and free to choose their thoughts and actions
determinism
that free will has no place in explaining behaviour
what are the types of determanism
hard and soft
hard determinism (fataliam)
suggests that human behaviour has a cause and principle, it should be possible to identify and describe these causes
soft determinism
whilst acknowledging that all human action has a cause, it also suggests that people have conscious mental control over the way they behave.
Biological determanism
the belief that behaviour is caused by biological (genetic, hormonal, evolutionary) influences that we cannot control
environmental determinism
argues that all behaviour is a result of conditioning and is shaped by environmental events
psychic determinism
sees human behaviour as determined and directed by unconscious conflicts, repressed in childhood
the concept of free will might be damaging to a person suffering from severe mental health that they have 'chosen their situation'
psychologists have argued that a deterministic approach may be more human than free will as it might make people feel better if they think their genetics cause their mental illness.
the humanistic approach argues that beliving we are in control of our own lives improves our well being.
research has shown that those with internal local control are happier and less at risk for depression. more ethical to use free will to explain behaviour.
however, if our behaviour was determinist there is a large-scale societal repercussions to follow
punishment and incarceration begin to look human
determinism makes recovery look unlikely
Bowlby's argumentent that maternally deprived children will be 'affentionless psychopaths' gives us no hope for future recover