Interference

    Cards (8)

    • What is Interference?
      Forgetting because one memory blocks another causing one or both to become distorted or forgotten
    • What is Proactive Interference?
      Older memories disrupt the recall of newer memories. Forgetting is worse when memories are similar
    • What is Retroactive Interference?
      Newer memories disrupts older memories. Forgetting is worse when memories are similar
    • Research Support Retroactive Interference: Support from lab study
      • Researcher conducted experiment in which PPs had to memorise word pairs
      • PPs that had to learn 2 word pair lists that used similar words struggled to recall the words from the first word pair list compared to group that had 1 word pair list
      • Provides support for retroactive interference
    • Evaluation: Real World Application
      • Baddeley and Hitch asked rugby players to recall the names of teams they had played against previously
      • The players that had been at the most games had the poorest recall
      • This increases the validity of the theory
    • Counterpoint to Interference
      • Interference is unusual
      • McGeoch and McDonald did a controlled lab study which doesn't truly show the effect of interference in everyday life
      • Lacks ecological validity making it difficult to generalise findings
      • Forgetting may be better explained by retrieval failure due to a lack of cues
    • Interference: Support from Drug Studies
      • Researchers gave PPs a drug while having to learn a list and recall a week later was poor compared to the control group
      • But when they learned the list before taking the drug, recall a week later was better than the control group
      • The drug improved recall of material
      • The drug prevents new information reaching parts of the brain involved in processing memories so it cannot interfere with information already stored
      • Forgetting can be due to interference
    • Limitation of Interference: Cues
      • Interference is temporary and can be overcome by cues
      • Tulving gave PPs a list of words and recall was 70% but as more lists were added recall got worse
      • At the end the PPs were given a cued recall test and recall rose to 70% again
      • Interference may cause a temporary loss of accessibility to material