Interference

Cards (8)

  • What is Interference?
    Forgetting because one memory blocks another causing one or both to become distorted or forgotten
  • What is Proactive Interference?
    Older memories disrupt the recall of newer memories. Forgetting is worse when memories are similar
  • What is Retroactive Interference?
    Newer memories disrupts older memories. Forgetting is worse when memories are similar
  • Research Support Retroactive Interference: Support from lab study
    • Researcher conducted experiment in which PPs had to memorise word pairs
    • PPs that had to learn 2 word pair lists that used similar words struggled to recall the words from the first word pair list compared to group that had 1 word pair list
    • Provides support for retroactive interference
  • Evaluation: Real World Application
    • Baddeley and Hitch asked rugby players to recall the names of teams they had played against previously
    • The players that had been at the most games had the poorest recall
    • This increases the validity of the theory
  • Counterpoint to Interference
    • Interference is unusual
    • McGeoch and McDonald did a controlled lab study which doesn't truly show the effect of interference in everyday life
    • Lacks ecological validity making it difficult to generalise findings
    • Forgetting may be better explained by retrieval failure due to a lack of cues
  • Interference: Support from Drug Studies
    • Researchers gave PPs a drug while having to learn a list and recall a week later was poor compared to the control group
    • But when they learned the list before taking the drug, recall a week later was better than the control group
    • The drug improved recall of material
    • The drug prevents new information reaching parts of the brain involved in processing memories so it cannot interfere with information already stored
    • Forgetting can be due to interference
  • Limitation of Interference: Cues
    • Interference is temporary and can be overcome by cues
    • Tulving gave PPs a list of words and recall was 70% but as more lists were added recall got worse
    • At the end the PPs were given a cued recall test and recall rose to 70% again
    • Interference may cause a temporary loss of accessibility to material