Meyer found that males who underwent MPA had recidivism rates of 35% compared to 55% for controls. This shows that biological treatments such as MPA are an effective way of reducing violent behaviour caused by biological drives
Supporting evidence 2 of biological treatments
Maletzky found that those who received MPA were less likely to reoffend than controls, showing that biological treatments are effective at reducing violent behaviour through biological drives.
Weakness 1 of biological treatments
Ireland found that 92% of those who underwent CBT did not reoffend suggesting psychological treatments are more effective at reducing violent behaviour compared to biological treatments.
Weakness 2 of biological treatments
Gagne found that both psych and bio treatments are needed for success as 83% of sex offenders who underwent MPA and therapy had a reduction in deviant sexual behaviour. This suggests that for biological treatments to be most effective they need to be combined with a psychological treatment.