Jesus on the cross was the ultimate act of sacrifice
corporeal visions
where people physically see something
imaginative visions
where people see something in their imagination or dreams
'after these things, the word of the Lord came to Abraham in a vision saying 'do not fear, Abraham, I am a shield to you; your rewards shall be great' Genesis 15:1
'and the Lord said to Paul in the night by a vision 'do not be afraid any longer, but go on speaking and do not be silent' Acts 18:9
visions are proof God exists
give great strength
lead to conversion
many examples in the Bible
there is lots of research to proof there is no other reason
Visions are not proof God exists
could be made up
could be a dream or the subconscious
minimal witnesses
no physical proof
could be caused by substances
why only certain people
miracles
an event which seems to break the laws of science and the only explanation is God
types of miracles
healing miracles
natural miracles
healing miracle
curing people from illness
natural miracle
calming the sea, generating more food, water to wine
exorcism
the casting out of demons or evil spirits from a person who is possessed
'the Lord drove the sea back wih a strong East wind and turned it to dry land' Exodus 14:21-22
the bible tells stories about Jesus' miracles
shows how special Jesus was- he had the power of God
resurrection was the biggest miracle
christians believe that miracles happened
For catholics, Jesus' miracles were clear signs of his divine naryre and of the nature of God's kingdom
religious experiences
an event that people feel gives them direct contact with God
conversion
an experience which changes a persons' life or religion
numinous
the feeling of the presence of something greater than you
transcendent
something going beyond human experiences
nature of religious experiences
a reminder of the omnipresence of God
build faith and gives people a sense of encouragement
may occur in religious buildings or sites, beautiful places or witnessing the natural world
why are religious experiences are/not proof of God's existence
wish fulfilment - humans want a being to satisfy dreams and wishes
lack of evidence- can't be proved
laws of nature - the laws of nature are unbreakable but miracles break them
hallucinations - use of stimulants
the watch analogy for the design argument
William Paley said a pocket watch was a complex thing
it has to have a watch maker
the world is complex and intricate
it couldn't have happened by chance so it has to have a designer
the designer must be God so God must exist
the Design argument (teleological)
so much of the natural world appears to be deliberately designed with order and purpose and there must be a designer which must be God
strengths of the design argument
complements a christian view of the nature of God - suggests purpose for life, a designer must be omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent
based on our own experience of design - there are many designed and purposeful objects that anyone can observe
encourages scientific examination of the universe - science and religion can agree on some things
weaknesses of the design argument
the uniqueness of the universe - David Hume if the universe is unique we cannot apply any analogy to explain it
the existence of evil and suffering - signs either God is a poor designer or he is not omnibenevolent and omnipotent
there is no order - Richard Dawkins suggest people see purpose and order because they want it to be there
evolution as an explanation of oder and surface - why would God design animals to evolve or go extinct
the cosmological argument
the idea that there was something which began or started the universe and that something must be God
the universe has a beginning because if it existed forever we would've used up all the resources and energy by now
everything in existence has a cause
Thomas Aquinas believed ordinary people believed in God because of faith bur philosophers believed because they could prove by reason that he existed
'now in efficient causes it is not possible to go to infinity... therefore it is necessary to admit a first cause to which everyone gives the name God' Thomas Aquinas
cosmological argument - domino effect
everything has a beginning of it's existence
the universe has a beginning of existence
the universe has a cause of existence
if the universe has a cause of existence then that cause is God
God exists
catholics believe the cosmological argument shows the omnipotent nature of God
strengths for the cosmological argument
it is more logical than the alternative - it makes sense and fits with events as believing in an infinite chain of causes and effects seems impossible
it is compatible with science - it doesn't contradict evolutionary theories
based on our own experience - everyone can see the evidence that all things have a cause so it is difficult to deny
' of all the divine attributes only Gods omnipotence is names in the creed... we believe that his might is universal, for God who created everything also rules everything and can do everything' ccc
weaknesses of the cosmological argument
the impossibility of a total explanation - Bertrand Russle argued an explanation of everything that exists is impossible as they all rely on earlier explanations
the first cause didn't have to be God - some scientists believe the first cause was the Big bang theory
the universe as a whole does not need a cause - Bertrand Russle said we have no experience of universes being created so we cannot assume it needs a cause
'unless we first know evil, we shall be unable to know God' Lactantius 13
the inconsistent triad
if two are true then the third's existence is impossible