CASE STUDIES

Cards (33)

  • example of mcdonalds occupational language
    crew captain
  • 4 examples of workplace jargon
    Premium Rate Facing off Clocking in Packing down
  • Why are legal terms so specialist?
    need for precision
    long history of law (from latin speaking times)
    prestige of law
    exclude non-lawyers
  • 2 military terms
    Jarhead - Marine
    Deep Six - Destroy or dispose of something
  • What does the military form?
    Closed Network - servicemen and women only associate with each other for long periods of time
  • what does a closed network lead to?
    specialist vocabulary and shared knowledge
  • 3 medical abbreviations/jargon
    CTD- Circling the drain
    UBI- unexplained beer injury
    CNS-QNS- central nervous system-quantity not sufficient
  • 2 service industry initialisms
    VNP- very nice person
    QF- quite fussy
  • 3 examples of school initialisms/acronyms
    GCSE- general certificate of secondary education
    NEET- not in education employment or training
    SEN- special education needs
  • What is a service encounter?
    Hasan and Ventola transactional interaction in which one person provides goods or services
  • How do you remember service encounters?
    OR - offers or requests of service
    T -Transactions of service
    S - Salutations
  • What the discourse structure of teachers reports?
    tends to be personality then how they work then how to improve
  • 2 examples of repeated discourse structure in occupational language
    prescriptions
    wills
  • discourse community
    John Swales groups who have goals or purposes and use communication to achieve these goals
  • what does membership of a discourse community help determine?
    topic
    lexical choice
    status
    politeness features
  • What is front stage conversation ?
    Goffman
    perform professional identity
    may be when with customers or with colleagues when doing work
  • What is a backstage conversation?
    Goffman
    different, more casual identity
    during social moments or when discussing personal matters
  • What are inferential frameworks?
    Assumptions that the participants share about each other in the context of a conversation
  • Inferential frameworks of workplace conversation examples
    Background information
    roles and status of people involved
    importance of completing the task
    discussable topics
  • What is an asymmetrical conversation?
    Goffman
    superiors demonstrate dominant behaviour, inferiors demonstrating deferential behaviour
  • What are the three main features of workplace conversation?
    types of speech - largely transactional
    Topic - formal conversations undergo less topic drift, high status speakers control choice of topics, high status speakers use topic looks to ensure conversations are productive
    Turn Taking - rules are more carefully followed than in casual conversation
  • What is Face Theory?
    Brown and Levinson
    When we interact with others we are careful to not offend or upset the people we are talking to. We also protect ourselves from being offended or upset
  • What is positive face?
    desire to be approved of and for others to see us in a certain way
  • what is negative face?
    the desire to feel unimpeded, we believe there are things we are allowed to to and things we can’t be made to do. Want others to have the same opinion
  • What is a face threatening act (FTA)?
    any utterance that offends you or upsets you
  • what is a positive face threatening act?
    suggesting someone doesnt view you in the same way you view yourself
  • what is a negative face threatening act?
    someone suggesting they don’t have the same ideas about what they can and can’t make you do
  • positive face in the workplace
    feedback and appraisal is part of many occupations, act in a more controlled way than in other situations
  • negative face in workplace conversations
    workers may not enjoy a particular task, they wont find it a face threat to be asked to do it by someone in an appropriate role
  • Cooperation Theory 4 Maxims
    Paul Grice - All conversations must follow this to be successful
    Quality - be truthful
    Quantity - right amount of information
    Relation - be relative
    Manner - be clear
  • Lakoff’s Deference model
    10 features that show deference in speech. In asymmetrical workplace conversation we can expect to see:
    hedges
    tag questions
    superpolitness
    speaking in italics
    hyper correctness
  • Dominance model
    Zimmerman and West
    features that a high status speaker may use in order to establish themselves as high status:
    interrupt and overlap low status speakers
    symmetrical speech- more overlaps than interruptions
    asymmetrical speech- more interruptions than overlaps
  • Eakens and Eakens
    study of faculty meetings, status and gender determined whether someone would be interrupted, most interrupted was a woman