keat + urry - science and sociology share similarities because they both study systems, but there are differences in ~
closed systems - researchers can control and measure all relevant variables to make precise predictions
open systems - the researcher has less control over variables so can make predictions, even if they aren't as precise
sociologists study open systems which are too complex to make precise predictions
underlying structures
keat + urry - science isn't necessarily purely concerned with observable processes, and often assumes the existence of things that can't be observed eg. physicists can't directly observe inside a black hole
this means interpretivists are correct and sociology may be able to be scientific
both natural and social sciences explain causes of events with underlying causes and structures that we can work out by observing their effects
this means a lot of sociology can be scientific, just without controlled closed experiments