physical attraction

Subdecks (1)

Cards (13)

  • physical attractiveness?
    • plays role in attraction in romantic relationships
    • highlighted in evolutionary theories that its displayed by - symmetry of face - indicated good genes & health
  • halo effect?
    • where an impression is formed from one characteristic
    • when someone is physically attractive we tend to have preconceived idea that they possess desirable qualities - trustworthy/optimistic
  • the matching hypothesis?
    • states that people choose romantic partner whos roughly of same attractiveness to each other
    • to do this we make realistic judgement of our value
    • we want most physically attractive partner but have to weigh up our own value to avoid rejection by going for someone who is out of our league
    • dont want to be with someone more attractive than ourselves - fearful that they will leave us for someone who is more similar to them in attractiveness & leads to jealousy
  • 2 * of physical attraction?
    1. evidence to support from murstein 1972
    2. evidence to support from walster & walster 1969
  • 2 X of physical attraction?
    1. ignores indivdual differences
    2. evidence to contradict from taylor 2011
  • * evidence from murstein 1972?
    • asked p to assess physical attractiveness levles of genuine & non genuine couples from photos
    • found that real couples were more likely to be judged as similar attractive levels than non real couples
    • shows matching hypothesis to be true as people are more likely to have greater attraction to someone of similar level of pa to themselves
  • X ignores individual differences?
    • when choosing partner some people prefer personality over physical attractiveness
    • eg someone may be lower/higher value of PA but may have same value when it comes to personality
    • also peoples perceptions of their own attractiveness varies
    • ignores individual differences & fact that PA may not be important in romantic relationships to all individuals
  • * evidence from walster & walster 1969?
    • told students that theyd been assigned an ideal partner for a dance - random
    • students met before dance & those who has been paired with partners of similar PA to themselves expressed greater liking than those who had dissimilar levels of PA
    • shows people show greater level of attraction when they have similar levels of PA to each other
    • feel more comfortable & less self conscious compared to if their partner was more attractive
  • X evidence from taylor 2011?
    • studied activity logs of popular online dating websites
    • measured actual date choices
    • online dates sought meetings with potential partners who were more PA than them
    • seems they didnt consider their own level of attractiveness when making decisions of who to date
    • doesnt support matching hypothesis as not all attraction may be due to having same PA value
    • in face to face situation fear of rejection is greater
    • online theres less risk so more likely to pursue more attractive person
    • suggests may be other factors affecting attraction other than matching hypothesis