filter theory

Subdecks (1)

Cards (16)

  • kerchoff & david 1962?
    • proposed filter theory to explain attraction & how relationships form
  • explain filter theory?
    • argue we tend to be attracted to those who pass series of filters
    • large groups of potential people for relationships known as "field of availables"
    • filter out potential partners for different reasons at different times so that FOA is gradually narrowed down to relatively small "field of desirables" - those we see as potential partners & most attracted to
  • 3 filters that lead to field of desirables?
    1. social demography
    2. similarity in attitudes
    3. complementarity
  • social demography?
    • were more attracted to people that we actually come into contact with & filter out those not in same SD to us
    • people tend to mix with others who are pretty similar to them in several ways - live in same area/similar social class/ethnicity/religion
    • much larger group of people who live in other places & come from different backgrounds are rarely encountered so not attracted to them
    • means field of potential partners actually comes from small selection of people who are often similar in educational/economical background
  • similarity in attitudes?
    • more likely to be attracted to people who have similar interests & attitudes as ourselves
    • once 2 people start going out together next filter involves individual characteristics - attitudes & values
    • if couple share ideas & beliefs communication should be easier & relationship may progress
    • as this stage people with different attitudes & values from our own likely to be filtered out as were more attracted to those with similar attitudes
  • complementarity?
    • more likely to find person attractive if they complement our emotional needs
    • means how well 2 people fit together as a couple & meet each others needs
    • can be physical/emotional needs
    • if someone does not meet & complement your needs they ae filtered out
  • 2 * of filter theory?
    1. evidence to support from taylor 2010
    2. evidence to support from kerchoff & davis
  • 2 X of filter theory?
    1. contradicted by evolutionary explanations for partner preferences
    2. lacks temporal validity
  • * evidence from taylor 2010?
    • found that 85% of americans who got married in 2008 married someone of their own ethnic group
    • shows that SD is an accurate filter as we are more likely to be attracted to & marry someone with similar SD to us
    • shows were more attracted to people who do pass through filters in particular SD
    • do filter those who are dissimilar in terms of out demographics to narrown down our FOD to someone we are more attracted to
  • * evidence from kerchoff & davis?
    • conducted longitudinal study of student couples who were together for more/less than 18 months
    • asked to complete several questionnaires over 7 month period - had to report in attitude similarity & personality trait with partner
    • found that attitude similarity was key factor upto 18 months
    • after psychological compatibility & ability to meet each others needs became important
    • shows were more attracted to those who do have similar attitudes & complement our emotional needs
    • suggests filters are important for maintaining attraction in romantic relationship
  • X contradicted by evolutionary?
    • women look for older man with resources & men look for youthful women
    • so SD may not be appropriate filter as we arent attracted to those who are similar age/class.
    • we may not be attracted to people based on filtering them out due to SD
    • instead it may be due to other factors - age/resources that will enhance our reproductive success
  • X lacks temporal validity?
    • as this theory was developed in 1960s many things have changed in todays society
    • now have access to social media & online dating platforms so can people who dont live near us & long distance relationships more common
    • but theory says we filter out those who dont live near us & are attracted to people who live in our area
    • ? temporal
    • in todays society we may not filter out people based on their SD being different so may still find them attractive