The superego works on the morality principle and punishes the ego through guilt for wrongdoing and rewards it with pride and satisfaction for good moral behaviour
Blackburn (1993) argued criminals have deficient or weak superegos as they give the id free rein to do whatever satisfies it
Can be weak, deviant, or harsh/overdeveloped
What is the weak superego?
The superego develops as a result of identification with the same sex parent and internalising their moral values - when there is an absent same-sex parent during the phallic stage the superego will not develop properly as there is no opportunity for identification
This leads to poor control over antisocial behaviour and acting in ways that gratified the id's impulses
What is the deviant superego?
When a child internalises a superego with immoral or deviant values as their parents which is likely to lead to offending behaviour
For example a boy raised by a criminal father is less likely to associate guilt with wrongdoing
What is the harsh/overdeveloped superego?
Internalisation of an overly strict or harsh parent - the superego becomes overly harsh and cripples the ego with anxiety and guilt
Leaves individuals committing crime wishing to be caught as the punishment would reduce their guilt
Or may use defence mechanisms to repress their anxiety, causing an overabundance of unresolved conflicts that ends up being expressed in extreme criminal behaviour
What is the theory of maternal deprivation in relation to offending behaviour?
Bowlby's argument that the ability to form meaningful relationships in adulthood is dependent on the child forming a warm, continuous relationship with a mother figure - failure to establish this during the first few years of life means the child is likely to experience damaging and irreversible consequences
Maternally deprived individuals are likely to engage in acts of delinquency and disrupts their ability to relate to others
Results in affectionless psychopathy - lack of normal affection, shame, empathy, etc.
What was Bowlby's 44 thieves study?
In 1944 Bowlby investigated 44 juvenile thieves through interviews w/ them and their families, finding that 14 showed characteristics of affectionless psychopathy and 12/14 had experienced prolonged separation from their mothers during the first 2 years of their lives
Concluded that the effects of maternal deprivation had caused affectionless and delinquent behaviour among the juvenile thieves
What is one strength of the psychodynamic explanation for offending?
Research support for harsh/overdeveloped superego: Goreta (1991) conducted a Freudian-style analysis of 10 offenders referred for psychiatric treatment and found disturbances in their superego formations
Each experiences unconscious feelings of guilt and the need for self-punishment which manifested itself as a desire to commit acts of wrongdoing and offend, supporting the role of psychic conflicts as a basis for offending
What is another strength of the psychodynamic explanation for offending?
Research support for harsh/developed superego: Megargee (1966) reported a series of violent acts carried out by people perceived as passive/harmless, like an 11 year old boy who stabbed his brother 34 times despite being described as polite with no previous history of aggressive tendencies
Represents a subgroup of violent offenders who are unable to express their anger in normal ways and eventually 'explode' and release their anger in one go
Supports use of defence mechanisms in people with harsh/overdeveloped superegos
What is one limitation of the psychodynamic explanation for offending?
Gender bias: inadequate Superego theory states that girls develop weaker superegos because they don't identify with their mothers as strongly as boys do, as they don't experience intense castration anxiety
Therefore they are under less pressure to identify with their mothers which implies women should be more prone to offending, but evidence suggests otherwise as in the UK only 1/5 of all crimes are committed by women and 20x more men are in prison than women
Suggests Freud's theory has alpha bias and may not be an appropriately generalisable theory
What is another limitation of the psychodynamic explanation for offending?
Reductionist: Bowlby's theory was only based on an association between maternal deprivation and offending
Lewis (1954) analysed data from interviews with 500 young people and found that maternal deprivation was a poor predictor of future offending and the ability to form close relationships in adulthood
Prolonged separation and offending is not necessarily a causal relationship as there are other reasons for this link such as growing up in poverty
Suggests the theory isn't the sole basis for offending