supreme court

Cards (41)

  • When was the Supreme Court established?
    By the Constitutional Reform Act 2005
  • What is the purpose of the Supreme Court?
    To guarantee judicial independence and separate the judiciary
  • What was the highest court before 2009?
    The House of Lords
  • How many Law Lords were part of the House of Lords?
    12 Law Lords
  • Why was the pre-2009 system seen as a democratic anomaly?
    Law Lords were part of both judiciary and legislature
  • Who was the head of the judiciary before the reforms?
    The Lord Chancellor
  • What roles did the Lord Chancellor hold?
    Head of judiciary, Speaker, Cabinet minister
  • What was the impact of the Lord Chancellor's multiple roles?
    One figure spanned all three branches of government
  • How were judges appointed before the reforms?
    Mainly by the Lord Chancellor with PM’s approval
  • What key changes did the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 introduce?
    Reduced Lord Chancellor's powers and established Supreme Court
  • Who replaced the Lord Chancellor as head of the judiciary?
    The Lord Chief Justice
  • How many Justices are in the Supreme Court?
    12 Justices
  • What is the purpose of the Supreme Court as established by the reforms?
    To codify and protect judicial independence in law
  • What type of court is the Supreme Court?
    Not a trial court
  • What does the Supreme Court ensure?
    The rule of law and fair legal process
  • What role does the Supreme Court play in judicial precedents?
    Sets precedents that lower courts must follow
  • What is judicial review?
    Citizens can challenge decisions by public authorities
  • What does 'ultra vires' mean in judicial review?
    Beyond legal authority
  • What caused the growth in judicial reviews post-1998?
    Devolution and EU membership
  • What reforms were made in 2013 regarding judicial reviews?
    Limited applications by restricting legal aid and raising fees
  • What significant role does the Supreme Court play in judicial reviews?
    Key role in major judicial review cases
  • What was the outcome of R (Miller) v The Prime Minister (2019)?
    PM's prorogation ruled unlawful
  • Why was the prorogation of Parliament ruled unlawful?
    It frustrated Parliament’s ability to function
  • What did R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the EU (2016) challenge?
    Government's ability to trigger Article 50 without Parliament
  • What was the ruling in R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the EU (2016)?
    Parliamentary approval was required
  • What did Steinfield and Keiden v SoS for International Development (2018) rule?
    Civil Partnership Act was discriminatory
  • What was the significance of NHS Trust v Y (2018)?
    Created a new legal precedent for treatment withdrawal
  • What triggers the appointment of Justices in the Supreme Court?
    A vacancy in the court
  • Who is included in the Selection Commission for Justices?
    Supreme Court President, Deputy, UK judge, non-lawyer reps
  • What qualifications must candidates for Justices have?
    At least 2 years as judge/lawyer or 15 years at senior level
  • Who makes the final appointment of Justices?
    The Prime Minister confirmed by the monarch
  • What is the role of the Lord Chancellor in the appointment process?
    Can reject candidates only for lack of qualifications
  • How are cases heard in the Supreme Court?
    By panels of 5–11 Justices
  • What happens if there is a majority decision in the Supreme Court?
    Majority decision prevails; includes legal reasoning
  • What do judgments in the Supreme Court establish?
    Binding precedents for lower courts
  • What was the outcome of Guestlife Ltd v Smith (2018)?
    Gig economy workers classed as employees
  • What was the ruling in Cliff Richard v BBC (2018)?
    Media breached privacy during investigation
  • What did Elan-Cane v Home Secretary (2021) rule?
    No requirement for third gender option on passports
  • What was the outcome of Coghlan v Minister for Cabinet Office (2022)?
    Government policy ruled illegal and incompatible with Human Rights Act
  • What was the ruling in AAA v Home Secretary (2023)?
    Rwanda deportation plan ruled illegal