EQ1

    Cards (50)

    • Superpowers = a country that can project its ideas and power globally and influence other countries using its economic, political, military and cultural strengths
    • power and influence of countries vary bc they have a disproportionate amount of global influence
      geopolitical power can be thought about as a hierarchy
      1. hyper power = complete global dominance, no rivals eg USA
      2. superpower = globally dominant, but multiple can exist eg EU
      3. emerging power = globally influential, only in certain things eg BRICs
      4. Regional power = leads on a continental, not global scale eg japan mexico and nigeria
      • the way ppl view the status of a country is subjective, some ppl view USA as a hyperpower not a superpower bc its sooooo powerful
      • EU is difficult to classify into a hierarchy bc all 27 countries are a nuclear weapons power (France) and worlds 2nd largest economy after USA 🦅 BUT bc there’s often disagreements it limits their power 🔋 AS well as the UK leaving the bloc in 2020
      • china is close to the USA in terms of power depsite being an emerging power
    • power has lots of diff sources
      • economic = large GDP -> wealth needed to be a global player
      • political = leading not following within global organisations eg the UN, IMF and the WTO
      • military = nuclear weapons, large navy and air force -> threaten or force a countries will on others
      • cultural = media and stuff to influence others which are appealing (soft power)
      • demographic = power = people to support large economy and military
      • natural resources = fossil fuels land for farming etc -> self sufficiency
    • types of power
      • hard = military and economic influence (trade deals and sanctions) to force a country to act a certain way
      • soft = political and cultural influence (diplomacy) more subtle way bc they view the persuader as respected and appealing
    • joseph nye = in 21st century most successful = combine hard and soft power -> smart power
    • whats more effective
      hard = direct action = gets results but is expensive and risky, may be seen as unnecessary or illegal = aggressor may lose allies and moral authority eg Russia 2014 invasion of Crimea
    • what’s more effective

      soft power = country has well respected cultures values and politics = enough to persuade some countries but not all
      BUT if applied well its cheaper and is all about creating alliances = friendly and may spread to other countries
    • international ranking of soft power put the USA, UK and France and Germany at the top of the annual rankings SOOO BASICALLY western liberal democracies
    • importance of type of power has changed over time
      past = hard power = most powerful
      19th/20th century = power comes from controlling most land
      • 1904 british geographer Halford Mackinder produced influential geo strategic location theory = Heartland theory
    • heartland theory (basically the area surrounding Russia) = WAS v influential
      • persuaded USA, UK and other HICSs that Russia had to be ‘contained‘ so it wouldn’t take over
      • reinforced idea control of resources = important
    • NOW heartland theory = old fashioned
      • modern military tech can reach deep inside a country = size not so important anymore = no protection
      • physical resources traded internationally = less need to produce domestically
      • wars/ conflict are no longer normal ways to gain power
    • soft power = more common NOW bc can still gain influence and maintain power by creating economic and political alliances BUT hard power still exists +
      • 1991 and 2003 USA and allies invaded Iraq to secure oil supplies
      • Russia invaded Georgia in 2008 and Ukraine/ Crimea in 2014 to ‘protect’ ethnic Russians
    • From 1500-1950 = imperial era
      EU powers conquered land in America, Africa and Asia and built empires that directly controlled territories
    • to develop these empires it required
      • powerful navies to transport soldiers and equipment to areas on potential conquest and to protect sea routes and coastlines from enemies
      • large and advanced armed forces to conquer territory and control it
      • businesses to exploit resources in the conquered territories by mining and plantation farming
      • fleet of merchant ships protected by navy to transport goods back home
      • ppl acting as gov and civil service to run the colonies back home
    • empires were maintained directly by force
      attempts to rebel against colonial power = brutally suppressed
      Britain = largest empire, peaked in 1920 when it controlled 24% of worlds land in several continents
    • empires ended 1950-70
      eu countries bc the cost of maintaining empires = too expensive after eu rebuilt after WW2
      china = basically a colonial ruler to Tibet = brutally suppressing dissent during rebellions by tibetans in 1959 and 2008
    • little to no other mechanisms were used other than military to control colonies during the imperial era
      • British india -> english culture was encouraged to wealthier Indians eg schools language cricket and dress
    • no superpowers or emerging powers have significant empires EXCEPT
      • Russian controlled parts of Georgia Ukraine and Moldova = mini empire = control has to be indirect
    • indirect control
      • political = dominant decision making role in international things eg within the UN, G7, WTO but some countries = disproportionate influence
      • military = threat of large powerful armed forces with global reach, selective arms trading provides weapons to key allies but not enemies
      • economic = trade deals and blocs to create alliances and interdependence
      • cultural = global media to spread ideologies
    • indirect power -> important in cold war era
      USA and USSR sought allies among other coutnires as part of the USA led ‘west’ or USSR led ‘east’ inc
      • military alliances eg NATO and Warsaw pact
      • foreign aid -> way to ‘buy’ support from other nations
      • support for corrupt and undemocratic regimes in the developing world in return for their support for the superpower
    • can be argued that western nations STILL control their ex colonies thro neo-colonialism incs
      • debt aid relationship = developing countries owe money for past loans to HICs but their poverty also means they depend on foreign aid
      • poor terms of trade = developing countries export low value commodities but have to import expensive manufactured goods from developed countries
      • loss of smart ppl bc they want to migrate to the HICs if possible
    • rise of china = emerging power since 2000 -> accused of Neo-colonial actions in Africa
      • challenging hegemony of the USA and former colonial powers
    • patterns of power change over time
      • unipolar = one globally dominant superpower/ hyperpower
      • bipolar = two opposing superpowers w/ diff ideologies but equal in status
      • multipolar = man equal powers w/ regional influence but less global influence
    • 1800-1919 (British empire) = unipolar
      1919-39 (interwar period) = multipolar
      1990-2030???(USA vs USSR Cold War) = unipolar
      future 2030 = bipolar? multipolar?
    • What is the most stable pattern of power
      • unipolar = stable bc there’s only one person at the top but it is hard to maintain this position eg USA called the ‘worlds policeman’ -> inv in numerous trouble spots all the time
      • bipolar eg Cold War sitch = inv tense stand off between opposing powers = high risk ‘scary but stable’
      • between first and second war = multipolar and no dominant power -> power vacuum allowing rise of nazi Germany and imperial japan w/ no country prepared to stop them
    • implication for the futures,
      after 2030 the world could be bipolar -> USA and china
      OR
      multipolar -> USA China India eu
    • emerging powers = increasingly more important in global politics, and dominance of USA will decline
      most likely to rival USA hegemony = china bc
      • huge Human Resources
      • economy grown massively since 1990 and not slowing down
      • increasingly engages with other parts of the world eg investing in Africa in term of mineral resources and Asia thro its belt and road initiative (BRI)
      • military ambitions to build a blue water navy beyond its coastline
    • other bricks countries and G20 countries = significantly more powerful in the future
      EU and USA share of world GDP = in decline
      china n India = Moore significant to global economy and likely to continue
    • emerging powers in the near future will
      • demand more say in global organisations eg UN -> India may have a permanent seat on the security council
      • more influence over global financial decision making at WB or IMF or WTO
      • greater role in international peacekeeping missions and disaster response as military grows
    • BRICS = 42% of global CO2 emissions sooo basically a global environmental governance agreement to tackle global warming needs to include them
      • at un climate change conference in paris 2015 the bric countries were inv in the agreement unlike the 1997 kyoto protocol only inv developing countries
    • emerging countries strengths and weaknesses (most important)
      • countries with ageing populations or declining eg japan russia china = major probs in the future paying for expensive healthcare and pensions at the same time their workforce is shrinking
      • shortages of physical resources -> derail ambitions of some countries eg india or growing pollution -> stall growth eg china
      • countries with modern infrastructure , balances economic sectors and good energy supplies eg china brazil -> better than ones yet to develop these eg india nigeria
    • china: strengths
      GDP by 2020 = 2nd
      strength
      • powerful manufacturing economy
      • growing military power and tech
    • china: weaknesses
      • ageing pop
      • unwilling to engage with global problems
      • environmental probs
    • india:strengths
      gdp by 2020 = 5th
      strengths
      • youthful population, demographic dividend
      • global leader in IT tech
    • India: weaknesses
      • widespread poverty
      • poor energy and transport infrastructure
      • lack of water resources
    • brazil:strengths
      gdp by 2020= 12th
      strengths
      • huge natural resources and farming potential
      • modern economic structure
    • brazil: weaknesses
      • economy has boom and bust cycles
      • limited military strength
      • political populism
    • russia: strengths
      gdp by 2030= 11th
      strengths
      • v powerful nuclear armed military
      • large oil and gas reserves
    • russia: weaknesses
      • difficult relations with rest of the world
      • ageing population
    See similar decks