reseach methods

Cards (108)

  • Laboratory experiment
    Experimenter has full control over what happens in the experiment, environmental factors and instructions are highly controlled, only one factor (independent variable) changes between conditions
  • Laboratory experiment
    • High internal validity, highly replicable
    • May lack external validity, ecological validity, and mundane realism, prone to demand characteristics
  • Field experiment
    Conducted in the real world, natural setting
  • Field experiment
    • Increased external validity and ecological validity, reduced demand characteristics
    • Lack of control over extraneous variables, reduced internal validity
  • Natural experiment
    Levels of independent variable have already happened naturally, researcher just measures change in dependent variable
  • Natural experiment
    • Allow research in areas not possible otherwise, high external validity
    • Lack of control over extraneous variables, reduced internal validity, not replicable
  • Quasi-experiment
    Participants cannot be randomly assigned to different levels of the independent variable
  • Quasi-experiment
    • Only way to study certain factors, but confounding variables may exist that differ systematically between conditions
  • Experimental method
    Manipulation of an independent variable (IV) to have an effect on the dependent variable (DV), which is measured and stated in results
  • Aims
    General statement made by the researcher which tells us what they plan on investigating, the purpose of their study
  • Hypotheses
    Precise statement which clearly states the relationship between the variables being investigated
  • Directional hypothesis
    States the direction of the relationship that will be shown between the variables
  • Non-directional hypothesis

    Does not state the direction of the relationship between the variables
  • Independent variable (IV)
    Aspect of the experiment which has been manipulated by the researcher or simply changes naturally to have an effect on the DV
  • Dependent variable (DV)

    Aspect of the study which is measured by the researcher and has been caused by a change to the IV
  • Experimental condition

    Condition where the IV is manipulated
  • Control condition
    Condition where the IV is not manipulated
  • Operationalisation
    Researcher clearly defining the variables in terms of how they are being measured
  • Extraneous variable
    Variable other than the IV that affects the DV but does not vary systematically with the IV
  • Confounding variable
    Variable other than the IV that affects the DV and does change systematically with the IV
  • Demand characteristics
    Cues the researcher or research situation gives that make the participant guess the aim of the investigation
  • Participant reactivity
    Participants acting differently within the research situation from how they would usually act
  • Investigator effects
    Unwanted influence from the researcher's behaviour, either conscious or unconscious, on the DV measured
  • Randomisation
    Use of chance to reduce the effects of bias from investigator effects
  • Standardisation
    Using the exact same formalised procedures and instructions for every single participant
  • Types of experiments
    • Laboratory
    • Field
    • Quasi
    • Natural
  • Population
    Group of people from whom the sample is drawn
  • Sampling methods
    • Opportunity sampling
    • Random sampling
    • Systematic sampling
    • Stratified sampling
    • Volunteer sampling
  • Experimental designs

    • Independent groups design
    • Repeated measures
    • Matched pairs
  • Pilot study
    Small-scale version of an investigation done before the real investigation to identify potential problems
  • Single-blind procedure
    Researchers do not tell participants if they are being given a test treatment or control treatment
  • Double-blind procedure

    Neither the participants nor the researchers know which participants are receiving the test treatment or control treatment
  • Less of a problem than matching participants in experiments
  • Matching participants
    • Time consuming and expensive
    • A large pool of potential participants is needed which can be hard to get
    • Difficult to know which variables are appropriate for the participants to be matched
  • Pilot study
    A small-scale version of an investigation which is done before the real investigation is undertaken
  • Purpose of pilot studies
    • Allow potential problems of the study to be identified and the procedure to be modified to deal with these
    • Saves money and time in the long run
  • Single-blind procedure

    A research method in which the researchers do not tell the participants if they are being given a test treatment or a control treatment
  • Double-blind procedure

    A research procedure in which neither the participants nor the experimenter knows who is receiving a particular treatment
  • Purpose of double-blind procedures
    • Prevent bias in research results
    • Prevent bias due to demand characteristics or the placebo effect
    • Reduce investigator effects as the investigator is unable to unconsciously give participants clues as to which condition they are in
  • Control group/condition
    Sets a baseline whereby results from the experimental condition can be compared to results from this one