Remoteness of damage

Cards (4)

  • The Wagon Mound [1961]

    The type of damage must be reasonably foreseeable.
  • Hughes v Lord Advocate [1964]

    How the damage occurs can be unforeseeable. Remoteness is not affected.
  • Bradford v Robinson Rentals [1967]

    The extent of the harm can be unforeseeable. Remoteness is not affected.
  • Smith v Leech Brain [1961]

    The Thin Skull Rule does not affect remoteness.